Applying physical input-output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities

By Klaus Hubacek, S. Giljum. 2003

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e09ef7a1d1eb3b139a49598b4fe80539c75ef3ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Barrett
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. T. Wiedmann
4. João F. D. Rodrigues
5. Tiago Domingos
6. G. P. Peters
7. Robbie M. Andrew
8. Reinout Heijungs

In Environmental Engineering

1. T. Wiedmann
2. G. P. Peters
3. Manfred Lenzen
4. Robbie M. Andrew
5. J. Barrett
6. Klaus Hubacek
7. F. Krausmann
8. D. Guan

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. G. P. Peters
2. T. Wiedmann
3. João F. D. Rodrigues
4. Tiago Domingos
5. Robbie M. Andrew
6. J. Barrett
7. Manfred Lenzen
8. You Li

Citations in the corpus

• Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts (2006, methodology): “Physical or monetary input/output tables are used for attributing land to the different categories of final demand and for calculating the ecological footprint of direct and indirect land use (Bicknell et al., 1998; Eder and Narodoslawsky, 1999; Ferng, 2001; Hubacek and Giljum, 2003).”
• Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods (2015, unknown): “Alternatively, monetary IOTs can be applied for the tracking of non-food products from processing industries to final uses, thus building a hybrid top-down approach.”
• Physical and monetary input-output analysis: What makes the difference? (2006, methodology): “- 11 used the same numerical figures as Hubacek and Giljum (2003) and the physical model (approach 1) proposed by Suh (2004).”
• Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer (2004, methodology): “framework by using physical input output analysis (Hubacek and Giljum, 2003).”
• Delving into the carbon footprints of Singapore--comparing direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions of a small and open economic system (2010, background): “While they provide coherent allocation of embodied emissions among sectors and regions, they often require mayor manipulation of input data which introduces uncertainties (Ahmad and Wyckoff, 2003; Hubacek and Giljum, 2003; Lenzen, Murray et al., 2007; Peters and Hertwich, 2008a, b, c).”
• A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand (2008, background): “For recent examples of the application of input‐output analysis to environmental impacts see Lenzen (2001; 2003), Munksgaard et al. (2005), Wiedmann et al. (2006), Giljum and Hubacek (2001), Hubacek and Giljum (2003) , and Wood and Lenzen (2003).”
• A synthesis of carbon in international trade (2012, background): “…and Caldeira, 2010; Davis et al., 2011; Peters et al., 2011b), international trade is also important in accounting for emissions from land use (Hubacek and Giljum, 2003), forestry (Mayer et al., 2005; Kastner et al., 2011a), biomass more generally (Krausmann et al., 2008; Erb et al., 2009),…”
• Consumer and producer environmental responsibility: Comparing two approaches (2008, methodology): “Recently, Lenzen et al. (2007), based on Gallego and Lenzen (2005) proposed a new indicator.”
• Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family (2014, background): “First, the carbon uptake land is hypothetical land that does not exist and thus conflicts with the actual appropriated land within the aggregate ecological footprint account (Hubacek and Giljum, 2003; Van den Bergh and Verbruggen, 1999).”
• The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions (2008, methodology): “EIOTs play an important role in economic policy analysis (e.g. Imura and Tiwaree, 1994) and are available for many economically important countries of the world (e.g. Hubacek and Giljum, 2003).”
• Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use (2013, background): “While a physical or a mixed unit MRIO model would be a better way to track land use more accurately (Hubacek and Giljum, 2003) there is, however, no existing physical input– output table at global scale thus the used monetary input–output model remains currently the only viable choice.”
• Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 1: A technical note on combining input–output and ecological footprint analysis (2007, background): “, 1999 ; Hubacek and Giljum , 2003 ; Sánchez - Chóliz 3 and Duarte , 2004 ) .”