A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand

By Robbie M. Andrew, Vicky E. Forgie. 2008

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/433e915681e238103c81dd6f908b42e7396a0257

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. G. P. Peters
4. D. Guan
5. J. Barrett
6. Richard Wood
7. Guoqian Chen
8. J. Minx

In Environmental Engineering

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. D. Guan
4. G. P. Peters
5. Richard Wood
6. J. Barrett
7. Guoqian Chen
8. J. Minx

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. T. Wiedmann
2. D. Guan
3. J. Barrett
4. Richard Wood
5. Manfred Lenzen
6. João F. D. Rodrigues
7. Tiago Domingos
8. J. Minx

Citations in the corpus

• INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS (2009, unknown): “3 Various mathematical approaches, based on input–output frameworks, for sharing the responsibility between production-based and consumption-based national emission inventories have been discussed (Andrew and Forgie, 2008; Peters, 2008a; Serrano and Dietzenbacher, 2008).”
• A CARBON FOOTPRINT TIME SERIES OF THE UK – RESULTS FROM A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL (2010, background): “In the international policy context consumption-based emission accounting is mainly framed as a discussion on how to assign responsibility for emissions between countries (e.g. Andrew and Forgie, 2008; Peters and Hertwich, 2008b).”
• Greenhouse gas emissions in China 2007: Inventory and input-output analysis (2010, background): “…trade, as indicated by the rapid increase in the number of studies using different input– output models for several single countries (e.g., Andrew and Forgie, 2008; Chung et al., 2009; Ghertner and Fripp, 2007; Lenzen, 1998; Limmeechokchai and Suksuntornsiri, 2007; Mäenpää and…”
• A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting (2009, methodology): “Other analytical techniques that can be applied in a multi-region context are structural decomposition analysis (see e.g. Minx et al., 2009; Wood, 2008) or quantification of shared environmental responsibilities between producers and consumers of goods (Andrew and Forgie, 2008).”
• CO2 emissions embodied in China's exports from 2002 to 2008: A structural decomposition analysis (2011, methodology): “The EIO method has been widely used to quantify emissions embodied in trade in allocating emission responsibilities (e.g., Tunc- et al. 2007; Andrew and Forgie, 2008; Muñoz and Steininger, 2010).”
• Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales (2010, unknown): “Methods have been developed to share responsibility upstream and downstream along the supply chain while avoiding double counting [34,35] and applied in different applications [33,36].”
• EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION (2009, background): “Again, input–output analysis offers solutions for sharing responsibility between producers and consumers (see, for example, Andrew and Forgie, 2008; Peters, 2008a; Lenzen et al., 2007; Rodrigues et al., 2006; Rodrigues and Domingos, 2008; Serrano and Dietzenbacher, 2008). The wider implications for ”
• Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions (2010, background): “Because economic welfare in a region benefits from the production of goods within its territory, there are quantitative approaches aimed at sharing responsibility for emissions among producers and consumers (14, 17, 18).”
• Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future? (2017, background): “Others take a contrasting stance, arguing that producers should also have a share of responsibility because it is them that decided in the first place to engage in the production of goods and services and to promote consumer demand for these products in order to harvest the associated economic and h”
• UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODELS – A CASE STUDY OF THE UK'S CARBON FOOTPRINT (2010, background): “Whilst current full producer responsibility may not be completely abandoned for full consumer responsibility, shared-responsibility principles may prove to be a compromise that is acceptable by a wide range of decision-makers (Lenzen et al., 2007; Andrew and Forgie, 2008).”
• Income-based environmental responsibility (2012, background): “Unlike production-based inventories, consumption-based responsibility accounts for the emissions generated through international trade, minimizing the effects of carbon leakage by holding countries responsible for the emissions embodied in their trade balance (Andrew and Forgie, 2008; Bruckner et al”