Inequality, Public Opinion and Redistribution

By L. Kenworthy, L. Mccall. 2007

414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e05ba50e759dc555e38aef5fc0c8ee2ab1fa50a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran
2. Ursula Dallinger
3. Isabela Mares
4. Daniel Schneider
5. M. Jæger
6. J. Mijs

In Finance

1. Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran
2. J. Mijs
3. Ursula Dallinger
4. Isabela Mares
5. M. Jæger

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran
2. J. Mijs
3. M. Jæger
4. Ursula Dallinger
5. Isabela Mares
6. J. Jordan

Citations in the corpus

• The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand (2019, background): “Empirically, however, the link between popular opinion and government economic policy is far from straightforward (Milanovic, 2000; Kenworthy and McCall, 2007; Gilens and Page, 2014; Schmidt-Catran, 2016; Iversen and Goplerud, 2018).”
• The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: A pseudo panel approach (2013, background): “…and Quadagno, 2003; Dallinger, 2010) or a longitudinal design with inference at the levels of countries (for example, Blekesaune, 2007; Durr, 1993; Kenworthy and McCall, 2008), this paper takes a middle ground and analyses whether macroeconomic and social conditions affect the demand for…”
• The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution (2011, neutral): “NOAM LUPU Princeton University”
• Response to David J. Samuels and Ben W. Ansell’s review of From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy (2014, background): “…Banerjee and Duflo (2003); Benabou (1996); Cheibub (1998); Cutright (1965); Easterly and Rebelo (1993); Haggard and Kaufman (2012); Jackman (1974); Kenworthy and McCall (2008); Lott and Kenny (1999); Pampel and Williamson (1992); Perotti (1996); Prado and Dincecco (2009); Putterman (1996);…”
• Income Inequality and Class Divides in Parental Investments (2018, background): “…cross-sectional comparisons and more on within-state over-time changes in income inequality (Deaton and Lubotsky 2003; Evans, Hout, and Mayer 2004; Kenworthy and McCall 2008), with particular attention to how income inequality may widen class gaps or disparities in important behaviors (Neckerman…”
• Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence (2016, background): “…inequality and demand for redistribution is that the analyses are either cross-sectional (for example, Lübker, 2007; Finseraas, 2009; Dallinger, 2010; Dion and Birchfield, 2010) or longitudinal but rely on aggregated data (for example, Aalberg, 2003; Kenworthy and McCall, 2008; Jæger, 2013).”
• “Last-Place Aversion”: Evidence and Redistributive Implications (2014, neutral): “Whereas the median-voter theorem (Meltzer and Richard, 1981) predicts that the demand for redistribution grows with income inequality, the large increases in inequality over the past thirty years have not led to greater support for redistribution in the US (Kelly and Enns, 2010), the UK (Georgiadis ”
• Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences? (2010, background): “Analysing the relation between changes in actual inequality and perceptions of inequality over time, Kenworthy and McCall (2007) established an influence of objective inequality at least for some countries.”