Internationalization of services: A technological perspective

By M. Miozzo, Luc Soete. 2001

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0451c03c1bd4e93e555370baef95fb09611f321

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of product innovation in small firms: A Comparison Across Industries (2004, background): “This is in line with authors like Evangelista (2000) and Miozzo and Soete (2001) who postulate such firms as being ‘supplier-dominated’ innovators, merely being passive recipients of innovations which are developed by others (e.g., by manufacturing firms).”
Determinants of Product Innovation in Small Firms (2006, background): “This fi nding mirrors recent classifi cation of innovative service firms like those of Evangelista (2000) and Miozzo and Soete (2001), postulating such fi rms as being ‘supplier-dominated’ innovators, merely being passive recipients of innovations that are developed by others.”
Are Trademark Counts a Valid Indicator of Innovation? Results of an In-Depth Study of New Benelux Trademarks Filed by SMEs (2014, methodology): “We use the taxonomy originally proposed by Miozzo and Soete (2001) to distinguish four groups of service sectors sharing similar characteristics as regards to innovation: supplier-dominated services (SDS), physical networks (PN), information networks (IN) and science-based and specialized…”
Innovation in the experience economy: a taxonomy of innovation organisations (2009, methodology): “…to making a taxonomy when one entering a new field (to create some initial order out of the chaos that always characterises empirical research in new fields) has been used before (e.g. Pavitt (1984) on manufacturing; Miozzo and Soete (2001), Gallouj (2002b), Sundbo and Gallouj (2000) on services).”
The determinants of regional specialisation in business services: agglomeration economies, vertical linkages and innovation (2015, background): “…the organisation, coordination and distribution of manufacturing production resulting from new technologies has raised the service content of many manufactured goods, which goes well beyond the simple ‘outsourcing’ or ‘contracting out’ of services (Ten Raa and Wolff, 2001; Miozzo and Soete, 2001).”
Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis (2016, unknown): “The assimilation perspective can be used to study and analyze service innovation by using and adapting the same theories and instruments developed for traditional product innovation research, but without translation or modification (e.g., Evangelista, 2000; Miozzo & Soete, 2001).”
Do Services Innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer Survey (2005, background): “The context for this investigation is the widespread perception that services are, at best, less innovative than manufacturers, if not largely passive adopters of technology, as is implied by the labels ‘‘supplier dominated’’ (Pavitt, 1984; Miozzo and Soete, 2001) and ‘‘technology users’’ (Evangelis”
Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation (2008, background): “To be more precise, two sub-groups of sectors can be distinguished here, each characterized by a different level of technological sophistication (Miozzo and Soete, 2001): (1) providers of distributive and physical infrastructure services (e.”
Did the global financial crisis impact firms' innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low tech industries (2018, unknown): “Previous studies have shown distinct differences in innovation processes in manufacturing and service industries (Miozzo and Soete, 2001).”