Women’s entrepreneurship from an institutional perspective: the case of Uzbekistan
By Friederike Welter, D. Smallbone. 2008
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfa4cdc8102d57a546f28d50fa1ffa2c8152e8b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Richard Lang
- Matthias Fink
- Ewald Kibler
- Kim Klyver
- Tomoyo Kazumi
- Norifumi Kawai
- David B. Audretsch
- Friederike Welter
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Sebastian Aparicio
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- Matthias Fink
- Ewald Kibler
- Friederike Welter
- Richard Lang
- Kim Klyver
Citations in the corpus
- Women's self-employment: An act of institutional (dis)integration? A multilevel, cross-country study (2013, background): “…level (Van der Lippe and Van Dijk, 2002), and women's entrepreneurship literature has increasingly moved away from an emphasis on individual socio-demographic factors towards a focus on the role of institutions (e.g. Jamali, 2009; Leung, 2011;Minniti andNaude, 2010;Welter and Smallbone, 2008).”
- Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward (2011, background): “There are examples where representatives of local governing councils (mahallas) assist women in the registration process, but also instances where local traditions constrain the activities of women entrepreneurs (Welter & Smallbone, 2008).”
- Institutional support and women’s entrepreneurial self-efficacy (2017, background): “recognition of entrepreneurial opportunities for women and influences the types of business ventures that they can create (Welter and Smallbone, 2008).”
- Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: A comparative institutional analysis (2014, methodology): “The work of Oliver (1991) and more recently Welter and Smallbone (2011) serves an analytical tool for exploring the different types of practices applied by entrepreneurs to react to and (in)directly”
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Descriptive statistics 5 5.10 Aidis et al. (2007), Peng et al. (2010), Storey and Tether (1998), Watson and Everett (1996), Welter and Smallbone (2008).”