Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study

By Russell A. Poldrack, Paul C. Fletcher, Richard N. Henson, Keith J. Worsley, Matthew Brett, Thomas E. Nichols. NeuroImage, 2008

568 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this editorial, we outline a set of guidelines for the reporting of methods and results in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies and provide a checklist to assist authors in preparing manuscripts that meet these guidelines.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df875280431169e26c9463c95c0aa6f12548076b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Molecular Biology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

On the Plurality of (Methodological) Worlds: Estimating the Analytic Flexibility of fMRI Experiments (2012, background): “Although no consensus guidelines for the reporting of fMRI methods exist at present, the reporting recommendations by Poldrack et al. (2008) provide a useful starting point.”
Brains and brands: Developing mutually informative research in neuroscience and marketing (2008, background): “(For a complete list of the technical information that should accompany any published fMRI study, see Poldrack et al., 2008.)”
Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis revisited (2011, background): “Community-wide standards of spatial normalisation and the reporting of peak activation locations in stereotaxic coordinates allow researchers to compare results across experiments when the primary data are unavailable or difficult to obtain (Poldrack et al., 2008).”
Hidden Multiplicity in Multiway ANOVA: Prevalence, Consequences, and Remedies (2014, unknown): “Note that this state of affairs is different for fMRI and genetics research where the problem is more evident and it is common practice to correct for multiplicity (e.g., Poldrack et al., 2008).”
Ten Simple Rules for Dynamic Causal Modelling (2009, unknown): “, 2008) and on reporting results from mass-univariate analyses (Poldrack et al., 2008).”
Don't fear ‘fear conditioning’: Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear (2017, unknown): “Besides general considerations about conducting and reporting fMRI studies (Poldrack et al., 2008; Thulborn et al., 1996), specific interactions of the fMRI scanner environment with emotional paradigms need to be taken into account.”
Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: the OpenfMRI project (2013, background): “…of the mental processes being examined (cid:129) Description of behavioral data during task performance Recent work has begun to develop frameworks for minimal information regarding fMRI studies (Poldrack et al., 2008) and for more detailed descriptions of cognitive tasks (Turner and Laird, 2012).”
Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. (2011, background): “For example, nodal time series are often corrected for head movement and for other “nuisance covariates,” such as global brain or white matter mean fluctuations, before estimation of association metrics (Poldrack et al. 2008).”
Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI. (2016, methodology): “Following earlier recommendations for reporting fMRI methods [186], a recent white paper draft (from the OHBM Committee on Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing, also known as COBIDAS) is likely to be adopted by the imaging community.”
Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis: Index (2011, methodology): “With regard to reporting of results, it is also critical that the details of the spatial normalization procedure are described in any neuroimaging publication (cf., Poldrack et al., 2007).”