Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI.
By J. Dubois, Ralph Adolphs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016
614 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24a03920ec3d1e2206d0c26f804b90e7f11bbdee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Dustin Scheinost
- X. Shen
- T. Constable
- Emily S. Finn
- X. Papademetris
- Emma Claire Robinson
- Daniel Rueckert
- Antonios Makropoulos
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Emma Claire Robinson
- Daniel Rueckert
- Antonios Makropoulos
- X. Papademetris
- X. Shen
- Dustin Scheinost
- Sarah Parisot
- Salim Arslan
Citations in the corpus
- Human brain mapping: A systematic comparison of parcellation methods for the human cerebral cortex (2017, background): “While alterations in connectivity can be associated with brain disorders, these could also be attributed to genetic variations (Dubois and Adolphs, 2016), topological differences between subjects (Langs et al.”
- Benchmarking functional connectome‐based predictive models for resting‐state fMRI (2019, neutral): “Larger datasets bring increased statistical power (Elliott et al., 2008), and many population-imaging studies use rest-fMRI to relate brain imaging to neuropathologies or other behavior and population phenotypes (Miller et al., 2016; Dubois and Adolphs, 2016).”
- Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? (2017, background): “…in acquiring, analyzing and sharing fMRI data (Eickhoff et al., 2016; Poldrack et al., 2016), researchers are increasingly—and commendably—shifting focus from reporting group averages to discovering links between imaging measures and behavior in individual subjects (Dubois and Adolphs, 2016).”
- Precision functional mapping of individual human brains (2017, neutral): “The observed differences between individual and group-average network descriptions carry important implications for future brain network analyses (Dubois and Adolphs, 2016; Satterthwaite and Davatzikos, 2015).”
- The effect of machine learning regression algorithms and sample size on individualized behavioral prediction with functional connectivity features (2018, neutral): “Particularly, significant associations between this measure and behavior/cognition have been repeatedly observed (Dubois and Adolphs, 2016; Liu et al., 2017; Smith et al., 2015).”
- A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data (2018, background): “Current literature on the fMRI-derived substrates of intelligence suffers from the same caveats as most fMRI-based individual differences research to date [61]: small sample sizes, and lack of out-of-sample generalization.”
- Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment (2016, neutral): “However, these techniques are not currently standard practice and require further development for widespread application (e.g., see Dubois & Adolphs, 2016).”