Capitalism and Conservation: The Production and Reproduction of Biodiversity Conservation

By Dan Brockington, R. Duffy. 2010

397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df84ea0bb0256956125a047afe2f7610d0948e4f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica (2012, background): “…of conservation can be viewed as elements, in part, of capital accumulation in their own right, seeking to commodify natural resources for economic return (e.g., Sullivan, 2006, 2009; Igoe and Brockington, 2007; Garland, 2008; Brockington et al., 2008; Büscher, 2010; Brockington and Duffy, 2010).”
Nature™ Inc.: Changes and Continuities in Neoliberal Conservation and Market‐based Environmental Policy (2012, neutral): “First, the dynamics of extracting from, polluting and conserving nature are becoming increasingly intense and urgent with an ever-accelerating rate of change under contemporary hypercapitalism (Brockington and Duffy, 2010; Kovel, 2002).”
Lively commodities and encounter value (2016, background): “His oeuvre has spurred a vast body of scholarship within geography and the wider social sciences examining how animals are transformed into commodities for exchange (Brockington and Duffy, 2010; Castree, 2003; Shukin, 2009).”
Rewilding: Science, Practice, and Politics (2015, background): “Megafaunal transfer can aggravate conservation conflicts in Asia and Africa, where landscapes for large mammals have often been produced through colonial modes of governance (163).”
Accumulation by securitization: commercial poaching, neoliberal conservation, and the creation of new wildlife frontiers (2016, background): “Of particular importance are the novel ways such a diversity of actors form partnerships with each other and the state and in which different types of authority are transferred (Brockington and Duffy, 2010; Igoe and Brockington, 2007; Peluso and Lund, 2011).”
The Environmentalism of the Poor revisited: : Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles (2014, background): “the compromise by international biodiversity conservation groups and organizations (Brockington and Duffy, 2010).”
“Fixing” Climate Change by Mortgaging the Future: Negative Emissions, Spatiotemporal Fixes, and the Political Economy of Delay (2019, neutral): “For understandable reasons, scholars commonly focus on capital ’ s pursuit of new or expanded forms of value production in response to crisis, as witnessed for example in discussions on market environmentalism (Brockington and Duffy 2010; Castree 2008; Dempsey and Chiu Suarez 2016; Lohmann 2011).”
Market Masquerades: Uncovering the Politics of Community-level Payments for Environmental Services in Cambodia (2012, background): “…the displacement of the state as conservation actor by private sector and non-government organizations (NGOs), and the adoption of market-based approaches rather than regulation as a means of achieving conservation goals (Brockington and Duffy, 2010; Büscher, 2008; Igoe and Brockington, 2007).”
Accumulation by Conservation (2014, background): “…as a companion to, or part of, global capitalist development rather than a reaction against capitalism (see, e.g. Castree 2010, Igoe et al. 2010, Brockington and Duffy 2010a, Arsel and Büscher 2012, Büscher et al. 2012, Roth and Dressler 2012, Fairhead et al. 2012a, Corson et al. 2013,…”
Unethical use of wildlife in tourism: what's the problem, who is responsible, and what can be done? (2017, background): “…by transforming natural resources into privately owned goods that can be marketed to tourists, who are willing to pay to see and experience specific landscapes and wild animals – and this revenue may in turn be used to secure these same natural resources (Brockington & Duffy, 2010; Duffy, 2008).”