Market Masquerades: Uncovering the Politics of Community-level Payments for Environmental Services in Cambodia

By S. Milne, Bill Adams. 2012

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26bdd090bd469acf9286e1ddb003c4c2cf98c5fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Fletcher
2. Bram Büscher
3. E. Corbera
4. J. Dempsey
5. Daniel Suarez
6. Adeniyi P. Asiyanbi
7. D. Raffaelli
8. Piran C. L. White

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bram Büscher
2. J. Dempsey
3. Adeniyi P. Asiyanbi
4. R. Fletcher
5. M. Rudd
6. E. Corbera

In Strategy and Management

1. Bram Büscher
2. E. Corbera
3. Adeniyi P. Asiyanbi
4. R. Fletcher

Citations in the corpus

• A political ecology of REDD+: property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River (2016, background): “…in ways that perpetuate regimes of unequal power relations, loss of local resource control, and various forms of dispossession (Arhin and Atela, 2015; Beymer-Farris and Bassett, 2012; Cavanagh and Benjaminsen, 2014; Mahanty et al., 2012, 2013; Milne and Adams, 2012; Nel, 2015; Osborne, 2015).”
• Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, background): “Dealing with risk and uncertainty regarding payment cessation, adverse selection and moral hazard, and the extent to which negotiated agreements spread unfairness by embedding asymmetric power relations, is vital (Ferraro, 2008; Wunder et al., 2008; Milne and Adams, 2012).”
• Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It” (2016, background): “…not only encompass but require substantial public funding, command-and-control legislation, and other elements seemingly anathema to “truly” market-oriented approaches (see Fletcher [2014] for review; see also Fletcher and Breitling 2012; McAfee 2012a; Milne and Adams 2012; Shapiro-Garza 2013).”
• The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “Based on their own analysis of the 'market masquerade' in a community PES project in Cambodia, Milne and Adams contend that ‘the significance of the PES policy model lies in the political and social effects of its design and implementation, not in its functioning as amarket per se’ (2012:136), while”
• Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “Milne S, Adams B: Market masquerades: uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia.”