DWARF GALAXY STARBURST STATISTICS IN THE LOCAL VOLUME

By Janice C. Lee, Robert C. Kennicutt Jr., J. G. F. S.J., S. Sakai, Sanae Akiyama. 2008

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

An unresolved question in galaxy evolution is whether the star formation histories (SFHs) of low-mass systems are preferentially dominated by starbursts or modes that are more quiescent and continuous. Here, we quantify the prevalence of global starbursts in dwarf galaxies at the present epoch and infer their characteristic durations and amplitudes. The analysis is based on the Hα component of the 11 Mpc Hα UV Galaxy Survey (11HUGS), which provides Hα and Galaxy Evolution Explorer UV imaging for an approximately volume-limited sample of ∼ 300 star-forming galaxies within 11 Mpc. We first examine the completeness properties of the sample, and then directly tally the number of bursting dwarfs and compute the fraction of star formation that is concentrated in such systems. To identify starbursting dwarfs, we use an integrated Hα equivalent width (EW) threshold of 100 Å, which corresponds to a stellar birthrate of ∼ 2.5, and also explore the use of empirical starburst definitions based on σ thresholds of the observed logarithmic EW distributions. Our results are robust to the exact choice of the threshold, and are consistent with a picture where dwarfs that are currently experiencing massive global bursts are just the ∼ 6% tip of a low-mass galaxy iceberg. Moreover, bursts are only responsible for about a quarter of the total star formation in the overall dwarf population, so the majority of stars in low-mass systems are not formed in this mode today. Spirals and irregulars devoid of Hα emission are rare, indicating that the complete cessation of star formation generally does not occur in such galaxies and is not characteristic of the interburst state, at least for the more luminous systems with MB < −15. The starburst statistics presented here directly constrain the duty cycle and the average burst amplitude under the simplest assumptions where all dwarf irregulars share a common SFH and undergo similar burst cycles with equal probability. Uncertainties in such assumptions are discussed in the context of previous work.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df7ac5c19ad7885f623d4b70c57f71a4dc72cbd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. F. Walter
  2. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. Mark R. Krumholz
  6. R. Somerville
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. C. Conroy

In Instrumentation

  1. F. Walter
  2. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. C. Conroy
  5. A. Leroy
  6. N. Evans II
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. Hans-Walter Rix

Citations in the corpus