A GALEX ULTRAVIOLET IMAGING SURVEY OF GALAXIES IN THE LOCAL VOLUME

By Janice C. Lee, A. Gil de Paz, Robert C. Kennicutt Jr., M. Bothwell, J. J. Dalcanton, José G. Funes S. J., Benjamin D. Johnson, S. Sakai, E. Skillman, Christy A. Tremonti and 1 more. 2010

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results from a GALEX ultraviolet (UV) survey of a complete sample of 390 galaxies within ∼11 Mpc of the Milky Way. The UV data are a key component of the composite Local Volume Legacy, an ultraviolet-to-infrared imaging program designed to provide an inventory of dust and star formation in nearby spiral and irregular galaxies. The ensemble data set is an especially valuable resource for studying star formation in dwarf galaxies, which comprise over 80% of the sample. We describe the GALEX survey programs that obtained the data and provide a catalog of far-UV (∼1500 Å) and near-UV (∼2200 Å) integrated photometry. General UV properties of the sample are briefly discussed. We compute two measures of the global star formation efficiency, the star formation rate (SFR) per unit H i gas mass, and the SFR per unit stellar mass, to illustrate the significant differences that can arise in our understanding of dwarf galaxies when the FUV is used to measure the SFR instead of Hα. We find that dwarf galaxies may not be as drastically inefficient in converting gas into stars as suggested by prior Hα studies. In this context, we also examine the UV properties of late-type dwarf galaxies that appear to be devoid of star formation because they were not detected in previous Hα narrowband observations. Nearly all such galaxies in our sample are detected in the FUV and have FUV SFRs that fall below the limit where the Hα flux is robust to Poisson fluctuations in the formation of massive stars. Otherwise, the UV colors and star formation efficiencies of Hα-undetected, UV-bright dwarf irregulars appear to be relatively unremarkable with respect to those exhibited by the general population of star-forming galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa8c1315aa19769755ce69eb79794dbd95c7001e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
  2. N. Evans II
  3. Benjamin D. Johnson
  4. I. Karachentsev
  5. E. Skillman
  6. Dmitry I. Makarov
  7. C. Conroy
  8. D. Calzetti

In Instrumentation

  1. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
  2. Dmitry I. Makarov
  3. I. Karachentsev
  4. E. Skillman
  5. Benjamin D. Johnson
  6. N. Evans II
  7. J. J. Dalcanton
  8. D. Dale

Citations in the corpus