Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes
By Robert L. Axtell. Science, 2001
1,212 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df616da979fbcbda615b35244a3cc5cfd925f423
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- John Van Reenen
- Nicholas Bloom
- Andrew B. Bernard
- Thierry Mayer
- Philippe Aghion
- E. Helpman
- Keith Head
- Peter K. Schott
Citations in the corpus
- Firm Size Distortions and the Productivity Distribution: Evidence from France (2013, neutral): “6See Axtell (2001), Sutton (1997) and Gabaix, (2009).”
- Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade (2008, neutral): “Recent evidence on this empirical regularity for the United States include Robert L. Axtell (2001) and Luttmer (2007).”
- Structural gravity equations with intensive and extensive margins (2010, neutral): “The distribution of manufacturing firms in developed countries appears to better correspond to a Pareto law in the case of medium-size firms (see for instance Axtell, 2001 and Cabral and Mata, 2003).”
- A theory on the role of wholesalers in international trade based on economies of scope (2018, neutral): “Moreover, the Pareto distribution has been found to correspond reasonably well with the real distribution of rm productivity, see Axtell (2001) or Luttmer (2007).”
- Product Market Regulation, Firm Selection and Unemployment (2011, neutral): “15We use the estimate in Axtell (2001) for the restricted sample without self-employed workers. it follows that ϕ = ( γ−1 γ ) .”
- CEO Pay and Firm Size: an Update after the Crisis (2013, background): “Figure 2 plots the firm size distribution confirming a fat-tailed distribution of firms, consistent with a Zipf’s law for firm size (Simon, 1955; Gabaix, 1999; Axtell, 2001; Luttmer, 2007), here firm size being firm total market value rather than the usual ‘size’ expressed by number of employees.”
- Complexity and Empirical Economics (2005, background): “Important examples include Axtell (2001) on firm sizes and Gabaix (1999) on city sizes.”
- Cultural Industries: Product–Market Characteristics, Management Challenges and Industry Dynamics (2015, neutral): “Most firms tend to be small independent of industry context (e.g. Axtell 2001).”
- Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy (2009, positive): “The first-order conditions (8) and ( 9 ) also imply that the measure of workers sampled, n ,t he screening ability cutoff, ac, the measure of workers hired, h, total output, y ,a nd wages,w ,c an”
- Why Has CEO Pay Increased so Much (2008, neutral): “See section III and Axtell (2001), Luttmer (2005) and Gabaix (1999, 2006) for evidence and theory on Zipf’s law for firms.”