Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change

By David Popp, Richard G. Newell, Adam B. Jaffe. 2009

695 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df58275f962ecd3bb78f664900432a10910d9f8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Economic growth and development with low‐carbon energy (2017, background): “Supporting clean-tech innovation requires a combination of environmental policies (addressing environmental externalities) and R&D policies (addressing innovation-related market failures) along the full “innovation chain” from research to development, demonstration and deployment (Grubb 2014; Popp 2”
The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? (2011, background): “…two market failures — the public good nature of knowledge and non-internalisation of externalities (Jaffe et al., 2002b; Newell, 2010; Popp, 2010; Rennings, 2000), calling for policies of push and pull, raising questions about the proper balance (Foxon and Kemp 2007; Kemp 2000; Popp et al., 2009).”
How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis (2014, neutral): “5 based approaches and ‘command and control’ standards (Popp et al., 2009).”
Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts (2012, methodology): “For recent reviews of the empirical literature on this theme, see Jaffe et al. (2002), Vollebergh (2007) and Popp et al. (2009).”
The rise of electric vehicles—2020 status and future expectations (2021, neutral): “…projections are used by a number of stakeholders to guide investments, inform policy design and requirements (Kavalec et al 2018), assess benefits of previous and ongoing efforts (Stephens et al 2016), and develop long-term multi-sectoral assessments (Popp et al 2010, Kriegler et al 2014).”
A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis (2016, neutral): “production and consumption (Popp et al., 2010).”
Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions (2021, background): “…set out the strong rationale for government support and incentives for innovation, both in terms of invention and its diffusion, in 23 For extensive reviews of research on environmental policy and innovation across a range of policy instruments and countries, see Popp (2019) and Popp et al. (2010).”
Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs (2018, background): “This result might seem surprising, but it reflects the fact that regulation induced innovation incentives and other demand-pull measures cannot replace public funding support (Popp et al., 2009; Olmos et al., 2012).”
Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy (2014, background): “…and shifts in consumption patterns, has been acknowledged to be a crucial factor in achieving environmental sustainability (Jaffe et al, 2002; Popp et al, 2009; Popp, ∗I thank all the participants to the EuroLIO 2012 Conference ‘The Geography of Innovation’ (Saint-Etienne, France), the…”