The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant?

By René Kemp, S. Pontoglio. 2011

573 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3f602df2b2c2a91b8e1f693ff07c2cb363bd2a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. J. Schleich
3. F. Kern
4. M. Mazzanti
5. D. Antonioli
6. S. Borghesi
7. Sandro Montresor
8. V. H. Hoffmann

In Marketing

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. M. Mazzanti
3. D. Antonioli
4. S. Borghesi
5. Sandro Montresor
6. Giulio Cainelli
7. J. Schleich
8. V. H. Hoffmann

Citations in the corpus

• Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector (2015, background): “…on the effects of policies on the rate and direction of technological change in environmental sectors have proved to be difficult due to considerable measurement problems related to both eco-innovation and policy dimensions (Del Río 2009; Kemp 2010; Kemp and Pontoglio, 2011; Lanoie et al., 2011).”
• The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions (2019, background): “2009), environmental economics (Lehmann 2010) and policy analysis (Howlett and Rayner 2007), have already sought to explore important aspects of policy mixes; such as the design features of individual instruments in the mix (Kemp and Pontoglio 2011), instrument interactions (del Río González 2006; N”
• The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies (2014, methodology): “Some recent literature argues that the innovation impact of policy instruments is mediated – or even determined – by design features rather than by instrument types (cf, e.g., Bergquist et al., 2013; Brouillat and Oltra, 2012; Kemp and Pontoglio, 2011).”
• The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry (2013, background): “It therefore seems likely that firm and technology characteristics have an influence on how a particular firm chooses to innovate in response to a particular deployment policy (Del Río González, 2009; Kemp and Pontoglio, 2011).”
• Are regional systems greening the economy? Local spillovers, green innovations and firms’ economic performances (2016, background): “The notion of EI represents a broad concept that can encompass various dimensions (Kemp and Pontoglio 2011).”
• Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis (2016, background): “A fifth abstract design feature concerns the differentiation specified in policy instruments (Kemp and Pontoglio, 2011), e.g. with regard to industrial sector, size of the plant, technology or geographical location.16 Sixth, the depth of the policy instrument addresses the range of its innovation…”