Sounds and size: identification of acoustic variables that reflect body size in hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas

By Dana Pfefferle, Julia Fischer. 2006

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df372cb919795461b06e345d01f21d55ff358c2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Anna M. Taylor
2. David Feinberg
3. L. DeBruine
4. B. Jones
5. D. Reby
6. J. Vukovic
7. Anthony C. Little
8. K. Pisanski

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Anna M. Taylor
2. David Feinberg
3. L. DeBruine
4. B. Jones
5. J. Vukovic
6. Anthony C. Little
7. K. Pisanski
8. D. Reby

In Social Psychology

1. Anna M. Taylor
2. B. Jones
3. Anthony C. Little
4. K. Pisanski
5. D. Reby
6. L. DeBruine
7. David Feinberg

Citations in the corpus

• The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research (2010, background): “Journal compilation c 2009 The Zoological Society of London224 correlated with caller body size (e.g. in both baboons and humans, males are larger than females and also have a lower F0; Rendall et al., 2005; Pfefferle & Fischer, 2006; Puts, Gaulin & Verdolini, 2006).”
• A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. (2010, result): “Similar findings have also been reported for fallow deer, Dama dama (Vannoni & McElligott 2008), baboons, Papio hamadryas (Pfefferle & Fischer 2006) and grey partridge, Perdix perdix (Beani & Dessi-Fulgheri 1995).”
• Vocal-Tract Resonances as Indexical Cues in Rhesus Monkeys (2007, unknown): “Similarly, acoustic measures of formant spacing in the grunt calls of adult-female baboons reveal that it is not reliably correlated with many different measures of body size [6], and no behavioral tests of adult body-size perception via formants in monkeys have been forthcoming.”
• Size Communication in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) growls. (2010, unknown): “Recent studies of animal vocal communication have shown that vocal signals encode information on the physical characteristics of callers such as body size, age and sex (Fitch 1997; Fitch & Reby 2001; Reby & McComb 2003; Pfefferle & Fischer 2006; Charlton et al. 2009).”
• Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: a meta-analysis (2014, background): “…& Fitch, 2013; for reviews see: Ey, Pfefferle, & Fischer, 2007; Fitch & Hauser, 2003; Taylor & Reby, 2010) and between males and females of the same species (e.g. in humans and nonhuman primates: Fitch & Giedd, 1999; Gonz"alez, 2006; Rendall, Kollias, Ney, & Lloyd, 2005; Pfefferle & Fischer, 2006).”