Privacy as contextual integrity

By Helen Nissenbaum. 2004

2,173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Privacy & Security, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Privacy & Security

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models (2020, background): “A broader view of the privacy risks posed by data extraction stems from the framework of data privacy as contextual integrity [48].”
Engineering Privacy (2009, background): “Since users are generally not involved, they need to trust in the contextual integrity of the data recipient [40].”
Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society (2014, background): “Effectively redressing this balance requires research to understand the contextual integrity (Nissenbaum, 2004) of uses of our personal data, and how this impacts services (Shilton et al., 2009) and new uses of our data both for research and business (McNeilly et al., 2013).”
Privacy for All: Ensuring Fair and Equitable Privacy Protections (2018, background): “Nissenbaum (2004) proposed the contextual integrity theory of privacy .”
Understanding Privacy Online: Development of a Social Contract Approach to Privacy (2016, background): “…body of theoretical scholarship has focused on privacy as contextually defined, where privacy norms are defined and examined within a specific set of relationships, situations, or contexts (Nissenbaum 2004, 2009; Solove 2006; Martin 2012; Stutzman and Hartzog 2012; Moor 1997; Jiang et al. 2002).”
Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications (2006, background): “In contrast, the framework of contextual integrity has arisen in recent years to provide guidance on how to respond to conflicts between values and interests and to provide a systematic setting for understanding privacy expectations and the reasons that certain events cause moral indignation [30, 32”
Technical Privacy Metrics (2015, background): “sonal information, according to the EU General Data Protection Regulation (and the OECD privacy framework [109]), is “any information relating to an [...] identifiable natural person” [51]. Nissenbaum[108] makes these definitions more practical and defines privacy in terms of contextual integrity, w”
A survey on privacy in mobile participatory sensing applications (2011, methodology): “For example, it is considered as appropriate for participants to share personal information related to their health conditions with their doctors [48], whereas sharing the same information with a different analyst, such as a campaign administrator, may be inappropriate.”
“Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics (2018, background): “In proposing “contextual integrity” as a benchmark for privacy, Nissenbaum (2004) emphasizes that information gathering and dissemination should be appropriate to context.”
Indiscriminate mass surveillance and the public sphere (2016, neutral): “…of privacy for political freedom merely see privacy from public scrutiny as a precondition for political freedom, rather than privacy as an integral part of the political domain (Arendt 1958, p. 70; Cohen 2000, p. 1425; Hughes 2015; Nissenbaum 2004, p. 132; Roberts 2014; Solove 2006, p. 551).”
Counteracting the Negative Effect of Form Auto-completion on the Privacy Calculus (2013, background): “A typical auto-completion tool that automatically fills all fields (Auto); 2.”
Online Media Forums as Separate Social Lives: A Qualitative Study of Disclosure Within and Beyond Reddit (2015, background): “One strong possibility is that compartmentalization represents a common strategy to manage contextual integrity, or to manage how their personal behaviors fit within contextually-specific norms (Nissenbaum, 2004).”
Privacy and analytics: it's a DELICATE issue a checklist for trusted learning analytics (2016, background): “Contextual Integrity is a concept that has arisen in recent years to provide guidance on how to respond to conflicts between values and interests, and to provide a systematic setting for understanding privacy [30].”