Engineering Privacy
By Sarah Spiekermann, Lorrie Faith Cranor. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2009
484 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebe52c1f5727e6081e0f5377845d97c8083a0fea
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- George Danezis
- Daniel Le Métayer
- Jaap-Henk Hoepman
- Rodica Tirtea
- Stefan Schiffner
- Marit Hansen
- Josep Domingo-Ferrer
- Óscar García-Morchón
In Sociology and Political Science
- Josep Domingo-Ferrer
- George Danezis
- Daniel Le Métayer
- Jaap-Henk Hoepman
- George Siemens
- Rodica Tirtea
- Stefan Schiffner
- Marit Hansen
Citations in the corpus
- Privacy in the Internet of Things: threats and challenges (2014, background): “Existing approaches to preserve privacy include client-side personalization, data perturbation, obfuscation and anonymization, distribution and working on encrypted data [91, 48].”
- Privacy and Data Protection by Design - from policy to engineering (2014, background): “ing (cf. Art. 5) that in particular have to be considered (cf. Chapter 3). Several researchers and data protection commissioners have published guidelines on how privacy by design could be understood [55, 183, 171, 111, 75, 197]. However, many system developers are not familiar with privacy principl”
- The Third Wave?: Inclusive Privacy and Security (2017, unknown): “In addition, there are more design-oriented privacy frameworks [12, 40, 52, 57, 87].”
- Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics (2014, background): “On the technical part, there are already several proposals that take privacy into account while designing tools in a model that could be called privacy by design (Le Métayer, 2010; Spiekermann, 2009).”