How good are my data and what is the resolution?

By Philip R. Evans, G. Murshudov. 2013

4,182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The new scaling program AIMLESS is described and tests of refinements at different resolutions are compared with analyses from the scaling step.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. L. Krause
2. R. Herbst‐Irmer
3. S. Prince
4. Dietmar Stalke
5. Eugene V. Koonin
6. G. Winter
7. G. Sheldrick
8. Carina M. C. Lobley

In Molecular Biology

1. Feng Zhang
2. Eugene V. Koonin
3. Kira S. Makarova
4. G. Winter
5. R. Gildea
6. Tim Grant
7. Bernd Zetsche
8. L. Krause

Citations in the corpus

• Mapping Neutralizing and Immunodominant Sites on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain by Structure-Guided High-Resolution Serology (2020, neutral): “Diffraction data were remotely recorded on synchrotron beamline 5.0.2 at ALS, indexed and scaled using Mosfilm (Battye et al., 2011) and SCALA or aimless (Evans and Murshudov, 2013).”
• Structural insights into the assembly of the histone deacetylase-associated Sin3L/Rpd3L corepressor complex (2015, methodology): “Diffraction data were collected using a Rayonix CCD Detector (Rayonix) at Life Sciences-Collaborative Access Team beamlines (APS, Argonne National Laboratory) at 100 K, indexed, integrated with XDS (52) or MOSFLM (53), and scaled with AIMLESS (54).”
• Structural Predictions of the SNX-RGS Proteins Suggest They Belong to a New Class of Lipid Transfer Proteins (2021, neutral): “Diffraction data was collected at the Australian Synchrotron MX2 beamline (Clayton, VIC, Australia), integrated with XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and scaled with AIMLESS software (Evans and Murshudov, 2013).”
• Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination (2015, methodology): “…scan was adopted: 2ðIÞcorrected ¼ ½K ðIÞraw 2 þ ðgIÞ 2: ð2Þ It should be noted that the current versions of SADABS and the programs XDS (Kabsch, 2010), AIMLESS (Evans & Murshudov, 2013) and HKL-2000 (Borek et al., 2003), which are very widely used for macromolecules, all use the same error model,…”
• Unexpected Receptor Functional Mimicry Elucidates Activation of Coronavirus Fusion (2020, neutral): “The LCA60 dataset was collected at the ALS beamline 5.0.1 and processed to 3.0 Å resolution in space group P21, with cell dimensions a = 70.72 Å b = 69.57 Å and c = 93.84 Å, using XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and Aimless (Evans and Murshudov, 2013).”
• From primordial clocks to circadian oscillators (2023, methodology): “The data were indexed and integrated in iMosflm 51 , and scaled and merged in Aimless 52 .”
• Conformational heterogeneity of Savinase from NMR, HDX-MS and X-ray diffraction analysis (2020, methodology): “The ambient temperature (RT data) were collected at 297 K, and showed negligible radiation damage; the cryogenic data (cryo data) were collected at 100 K. Images were integrated using XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and scaled with Aimless (Evans & Murshudov, 2013).”
• Decision making in xia2 (2013, methodology): “Three-dimensional pipeline: scaling with XSCALE SCALA and AIMLESS use a parameterized model to determine the scale factors for each reflection.”