Testing the Value of Six Taxonomic Groups as Biodiversity Indicators at a Local Scale
By V. Kati, P. Devillers, Marc Dufrêne, A. Legakis, D. Vokou, P. Lebrun. 2004
273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dea9f5801f66f1ba370be4d623861dc35f87333c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- T. Gardner
- P. Abellán
- D. Sánchez‐Fernández
- K. M. Rosenfeld
- C. A. Peres
- A. Millán
- Allison K. Leidner
- Katherine A. Eschelbach
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- R. Holderegger
- J. Kouki
- Maarit Similä
- P. Taberlet
- H. Niklfeld
- P. Abellán
- D. Sánchez‐Fernández
- C. A. Peres
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Jos Barlow
- C. A. Peres
- T. Gardner
- P. Abellán
- R. Holderegger
- D. Sánchez‐Fernández
- H. Niklfeld
- P. Taberlet
Citations in the corpus
- Macroecological patterns of species and genetic diversity in vascular plants of the Mediterranean basin (2010, background): “This suggests that richness in woody plant taxa is a valid indicator (and surrogate) of biodiversity levels in other taxonomic groups, e.g. vascular plants in general (this study) and insects (Kati et al., 2004).”
- Co-variation and indicators of species diversity: Can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests? (2006, methodology): “, 2005) but less often in small-scale (Howard et al., 1998; Jonsson and Jonsell, 1999; Pharo et al., 1999; Berglund and Jonsson, 2001; Ranius, 2002; Kati et al., 2004).”
- Relationships among levels of biodiversity and the relevance of intraspecific diversity in conservation - a project synopsis (2008, result): “Alternatively, deducing overall species richness from a taxonomic subset of organisms, thought to be representative of other taxonomic groups, is widespread, but has yielded contradictory results (e.g. Sætersdal et al., 2003; Kati et al., 2004; Sauberer et al., 2004; Englisch et al., 2005).”
- Seven Reasons Why Protists Make Useful Bioindicators (2013, background): “…a major question is how to direct conservation efforts to maximise preservation of biodiversity; the diversity of all groups cannot be feasibly studied in all areas so there is a desire to identify indicator organisms as proxies for ecosystem biodiversity (Schulze et al. 2004, Kati et al. 2004).”
- The amphibian decline crisis: A watershed for conservation biology? (2005, background): “Kati et al. (2004) compared six groups of taxa to determine their efficiency as biodiversity indicators in northern Greece.”
- Biodiversity: Function and Assessment in Agricultural Areas: A Review (2005, background): “Instead of measure all the biodiversity, many scientists hold the view that the dynamics of taxa gives a picture of the dynamics of biodiversity [34, 36, 37, 64, 65, 68, 80, 107, 108].”
- Complementarity analysis: Mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity (2006, background): “Araujo et al., 2004; Kati et al., 2004; Saetersdal et al., 2004; Trakhtenbrot and Kadmon, 2005).”
- Recommendations for Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogate Species Approaches (2006, methodology): “Partially Effective 2 17 6 25 Carroll et al. 2003; Rubino Kremen 1992; Ryti 1992; Oliver and Beattie 1996; Niemi et al. 1997; Chase et al. 2000; Moritz 2001; Bonn et al. 2002; Negi and Gadgil 2002; Ranius 2002; Lawler et al. 2003; Manne and Williams 2003; Cardoso et al. 2004; Kati et al. 2004; Su ”
- Are Water Beetles Good Indicators of Biodiversity in Mediterranean Aquatic Ecosystems? The Case of the Segura River Basin (SE Spain) (2006, background): “In this sense and taking into consideration that environmental heterogeneity is one of the main factors generating biological diversity (Cellot et al. 1994; Huston 1994; Kati et al. 2004), the complementary network of water beetles encompasses the gradient of environmental heterogeneity and thus con”
- The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Amazon (2007, background): “Low levels of congruency have been found among the responses of higher taxonomic groups to habitat disturbance (Lawton et al. 1998; Ghazoul 2002; Kati et al. 2004; but see Schulze et al. 2004).”