Complementarity analysis: Mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity

By Paul H. Williams, Daniel P. Faith, L. Manne, W. Sechrest, Chris D. Preston. 2006

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e87086a90b4137cf5bcb63756bcd052a10d69d10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. John J. Wiens
2. A. Balmford
3. F. W. Larsen
4. J. Bladt
5. R. Naidoo
6. Atte Moilanen
7. R. Pressey
8. G. Hayward

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Atte Moilanen
2. Aija S. Kukkala
3. A. Balmford
4. R. Pressey
5. R. Naidoo
6. John J. Wiens
7. G. Hayward
8. C. Rahbek

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Atte Moilanen
2. Aija S. Kukkala
3. C. Rahbek
4. A. Balmford
5. John J. Wiens
6. F. W. Larsen
7. J. Bladt
8. R. Pressey

Citations in the corpus

• Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests (2008, result): “…of one group reflects diversity in another, unrelated group—are the focus of much recent conservation biology research, with mixed results (e.g. Howard et al. 1998; Vessby et al. 2002; Sætersdal et al. 2003; Anand et al. 2005; Oertli et al. 2005; Williams et al. 2006; Similä et al. 2006).”
• Using Surrogate Species and Groups for Conservation Planning and Management (2008, background): “The more 246 BioScience • March 2008 / Vol. 58 No. 3 www.biosciencemag.org specific the management objectives (e.g., Williams et al. 2006), the more targeted and effective a surrogate or grouping approach is likely to be.”
• Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning (2012, background): “Note that targets can also be specified, and complementarity evaluated in relation to various targets, including those specified for persistence of features (Faith & Walker, 1996a, b; Reyers, Van Jaarsveld & Kruger, 2000; Faith et al., 2003; Davis, Costello & Stoms, 2006; Williams et al., 2006).”
• Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation? (2010, background): “Studies examining different biodiversity surrogates have demonstrated dissimilarities in conservation outcomes depending on what biodiversity surrogates were selected (Jaarsveld et al., 1998; Williams et al., 2006).”
• Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness? (2012, background): “Nonetheless, several studies have found birds to perform relatively poorly as biodiversity surrogates (Lund & Rahbek 2002; Moore et al. 2003; Williams et al. 2006).”