Outliers : An Evaluation of Methodologies

By Dhiren Ghosh, A. Vogt. 2012

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dea2a8a665de3605d075c22a0a897ec7d20a14a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jeremy Hall
2. Ben R. Martin
3. Lutz Bornmann
4. F. Kitagawa
5. Bruno Silvestre
6. Reetta Muhonen
7. Almas Heshmati

Citations in the corpus

• Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research (2019, background): “On the other hand, many would regard Winsorization of data – the assigning of lesser weight to an apparently spurious outlier – as acceptable (see e.g. Dixon and Tukey, 1968; Ghosh and Vogt, 2012).”