Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research

By Jeremy Hall, Ben R. Martin. Research Policy, 2019

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper examines the growing pressures and incentives encouraging research misconduct, along with the consequences, as illustrated by the case of business school research. Drawing on a review of the literature on different theoretical approaches to analysing organizational misconduct, we develop a formal taxonomy distinguishing appropriate conduct from blatantly inappropriate misconduct but with a specific focus on the ‘grey’ areas between these extremes in the form of questionable and inappropriate behaviour. We identify various sources of research misbehaviour and different categories of those affected. The aim is to provide a clearer understanding of what research behaviour is deemed appropriate or not, which stakeholders it affects, and the pressures and incentives likely to exacerbate such misconduct. We conclude with a discussion of how the taxonomy can help shape future good research practice (thereby setting a better example to students), and offer some propositions for future research.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/461277dd5a41241f0bb05f8d52a7f8d059cd959e