Pragmatics in Second Language Learning

By G. Kasper, Carsten Roever. 2005

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de988af597b967a320669bfa72418da3af8b787a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Naoko Taguchi
2. Carsten Roever
3. K. Bardovi-Harlig
4. S. Youn

Citations in the corpus

• Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues (2011, result): “These studies compared the effects of certain teaching methods over others by measuring the degree of learning from pre- to post-instruction (Kasper, 2001; Kasper & Roever, 2005; Martı́nez-Flor & Alcón-Soler, 2005; Roever, 2009).”
• Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going (2015, background): “, as well as in a meta-analysis (Jeon & Kaya 2006) and a line of major review articles on instructional pragmatics (e.g., Kasper & Rose 1999, 2002; Kasper & Roever 2005; Rose 2005; Cohen 2008; Takahashi 2010a, 2010b; Taguchi 2011).”
• Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics (2006, background): “This makes the DCT problematic as a survey instrument, but since it does elicit knowledge about possible speech act realizations (Kasper and Roever, 2005) it is an appropriate instrument for testing pragmalinguistic knowledge.”