Information system integration

By W. Hasselbring. CACM, 2000

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de986f97c9378372477ac08c7152c2d56064c212

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Wing Lam
2. Nilesh Saraf
3. Li D. Xu
4. Prabhudev Konana
5. Sanjay Gosain
6. Andrew Whinston
7. Christoph Schlueter Langdon

In Information Systems

1. Wing Lam
2. Nilesh Saraf
3. Li D. Xu
4. Sanjay Gosain
5. Christoph Schlueter Langdon

In Management Information Systems

1. Wing Lam
2. Nilesh Saraf
3. Li D. Xu
4. Sanjay Gosain
5. Anitesh Barua
6. Andrew Whinston
7. Christoph Schlueter Langdon
8. Lida Xu

Citations in the corpus

• Information architecture for supply chain quality management (2011, background): “Hasselbring (2000) proposed three layers of architecture that integrates different types of architecture.”
• Enterprise Systems: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends (2011, unknown): “tectures [42].”
• IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships (2007, methodology): “A reflective scale was developed from prior literature on operational-integration in the sales channel context (Hasselbring 2000, Yang and Papazoglou 2000).”
• An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value (2004, background): “2000), and the visibility of customer orders throughout the organization (Hasselbring 2000).”
• Barriers to e-government integration (2005, background): “Business integration Organisation do not have business processes which are closely integrated and which flow seamlessly Business process modelling can support the integration of business processes and serve to determine the way in which applications should be integrated Business process modelling Ha”