The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots

By Christoph Bartneck, Tomohiro Suzuki, Takayuki Kanda, Tatsuya Nomura. Ai & Society, 2006

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de842b28fb178652603b75ab5c6ca4e924a86db8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots (2020, background): “However, trust was typically assessed via subscales of adapted questionnaires relating to specific mod[33] [84] [45] [49] [87] [27] [18] [79] [52] [102] [38] [28] [51] [50] [17] [56] [116] [38] [108] [95]”
Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review (2009, background): “As it has been shown that robot perception is culturally dependent [17] results should therefore not be generalized too easily to other cultures.”
Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor (2010, background): “One of the difﬁculties in this endeavor is that the attitude towards robots varies greatly across cultures [4].”
Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions (2009, neutral): “tures in their attitudes towards robots [52].”
Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction (2012, background): “’s psychological determinants likely to be related to other person-related factors, such as expertise/experience with a system [23] [24].”
Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots (2013, background): “Previous experience with specific technology has a positive effect on usefulness, ease of use, attitude towards robots, intention to use, and actual use of that technology [16,46,61,62].”
Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research (2020, background): “It seems that when the initial predispositions toward robots are not negative, such as in the case of U.S. users (Bartneck et al., 2006), tangibility may increase emotional trust.”
Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda (2019, background): “factors, such as the level of anthropomorphism andmanipulability, likely moderate any cultural influences (Bartneck et al., 2007).”
A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task (2010, background): “Bartneck’s early studies indicated the cultural differences in people’s negative attitudes towards robots and explained the different attitudes with different levels of exposure to robots [15, 16].”
Marketing robot services in hospitality and tourism: the role of anthropomorphism (2019, background): “Finally, ample evidence suggests that a robot user ’ s culture affects how they perceive robots (Bartneck, Suzuki, Kanda, & Nomura, 2007; Kaplan, 2004; Rau, Li, & Li, 2009).”
Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots (2008, background): “On the other hand, computer anxiety involves more affective responses such as fear, apprehension, intimidation, hostility, and worries that one will be embarrassed, look stupid, or even damage the equipment.”