Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots
By Maartje de Graaf, Somaya Ben Allouch. Robotics Auton. Syst., 2013
461 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5541bbec20c4c06632089766535fbed1f475f4f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Social Psychology
- Jesse Fox
- Martin Wetzels
- Thomas Llewelyn Webb
- Peter M. Gollwitzer
- P. Sheeran
- G. Oettingen
- Kathleen D. Vohs
- Roy F. Baumeister
Citations in the corpus
- Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing (2019, background): “…33 · Number 4 · 2019 · 507–518 existing literature, trust correlated positively with perceived enjoyment (Lee et al., 2007; Wu and Chang, 2005; Zhou et al., 2010), which in turn enhances intentions to use humanoid service robots (de Graaf and Allouch, 2013; Heerink et al., 2008; Hong et al., 2008).”
- A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots (2020, background): “[49] [46] [62] [108] [44] [47] [117] [130] [61] [87] [40] [112] [45] [103] [38] [39] [41] [131] [119] [37] [125] [27] [78] [48] [59] [17] [18] [53] [60] [7] [58] [50]”
- Building a Stronger CASA: Extending the Computers Are Social Actors Paradigm (2020, background): “The study of anthropomorphism within the CASA paradigm has suggested generally positive effects (de Graaf & Allouch, 2013).”