Is Organization Theory Obvious to Practitioners? A Test of One Established Theory

By Richard L. Priem, Joseph G. Rosenstein. 2000

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de3fab725121e0c1128447822a827a6c71507d66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. J. Haynie
2. A. McKelvie
3. S. Simmons
4. Dan K. Hsu
5. David W. Williams
6. Jeffrey E. Mcgee

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. A. McKelvie
2. J. Haynie
3. S. Simmons
4. Dan K. Hsu
5. Charles Y. Murnieks
6. Troy R. Harting
7. David W. Williams
8. Richard L. Priem

Citations in the corpus

• Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action (2011, result): “This reporting of results is consistent with other studies that have used orthogonal factorial designs for metric conjoint analyses (cf., Priem, 1994; Priem and Rosenstein, 2000).”
• What matters, matters differently: a conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors (2014, methodology): “This is consistent with other studies using orthogonal factorial designs for metric conjoint analyses (cf. Priem 1994; Priem and Rosenstein 2000).”
• Opportunity Evaluation as Rule‐Based Decision Making (2014, background): “…2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies investigating entrepreneurial decision-making via the conjoint approach (cf. Haynie et al., 2009: n = 73; Priem and Rosenstein, 2000: n = 33; Shepherd and Zacharakis, 1997: n = 66; Zacharakis and Meyer, 1998: n = 53).”
• Venture Creation and the Enterprising Individual: A Review and Synthesis (2003, background): “Priem and Rosenstein (2000)conducted a study that may be a useful exemplar for future studies examining the opportunity exploitation decision.”
• ‘I Like How You Think’: Similarity as an Interaction Bias in the Investor–Entrepreneur Dyad (2011, methodology): “Since the research design (full factorial conjoint) ensures that there is zero correlation between the independent variables, testing and subsequently reporting two models (main-effects and full) is neither necessary nor appropriate (Priem, 1994; Priem and Rosenstein, 2000).”