Retheorizing accounting, writing and money with evidence from Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt

By M. Ezzamel, K. Hoskin. 2002

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Management Information Systems, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de2b9888bfc4cc060811b5ecd8c052c5722fe6f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. Ed Vosselman

In Management Information Systems

1. Ed Vosselman
2. K. Robson
3. P. Stapleton
4. M. Ezzamel

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ed Vosselman

Citations in the corpus

• The logics of budgeting: theorization and practice variation in the educational field (2012, background): “Particularly given the general interest in theorizing accounting as practice (Ahrens & Chapman, 2007; Ezzamel & Hoskin, 2002), there is a paucity of research of this type in the organizational NIT, and even more so in the accounting literature informed by NIT (Lounsbury, 2008).”
• The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: Towards a relational ontology of management accounting (2014, background): “Although as a technology accounting came in as a ‘visible sign system before writing’ (Ezzamel and Hoskin 2002, p. 35) reaching back to ancient Egypt (Ezzamel 2012), the act of accounting may be seen as a practice of economic writing (Krämer 1996, Kalthoff 2005).”