Persuasion: Empirical Evidence

By Stefano DellaVigna, Matthew Gentzkow. 2010

592 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We provide a selective survey of empirical evidence on the effects as well as the drivers of persuasive communication. We consider persuasion directed at consumers, voters, donors, and investors. We organize our review around four questions. First, to what extent does persuasion affect the behavior of each of these groups? Second, what models best capture the response to persuasive communication? In particular, we distinguish information-based models from preference-based models. Third, what are persuaders' incentives and what limits their ability to distort communications? Finally, what evidence exists on the equilibrium outcomes of persuasion in economics and politics?

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de177f0cee8b323a6350c044fe2fcb501f413a1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. D. Toniatti
  2. Donald P. Green
  3. David Y. Yang
  4. Prafulla Kumar Choubey
  5. James N. Druckman
  6. Rupert Sausgruber
  7. Hugo Mercier
  8. Arthur Lupia

In Safety Research

  1. Hugo Mercier
  2. David E. Broockman
  3. Joshua L. Kalla
  4. S. Jayachandran
  5. Tarun Jain
  6. Diva Dhar
  7. Francesco Drago
  8. Francesco Sobbrio

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. David E. Broockman
  2. Joshua L. Kalla
  3. Hugo Mercier
  4. S. Jayachandran
  5. Arthur Lupia
  6. D. Toniatti
  7. Christian Traxler
  8. Tarun Jain

Citations in the corpus