Knowledge bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters.

By Bjørn T. Asheim, Lars Coenen. 2005

1,582 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddf36679436aba64fa15af63bf42f83555313eb0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Emerging cities of the third wave (2011, background): “…of interrelated firms; (b) large and many-sided local labor markets; and (c) learning and innovation processes based on the grids of socio-economic interaction that characterize these kinds of systems, especially when tacit knowledge effects are present (Asheim and Coenen, 2005; Gertler, 2003).”
Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective (2016, background): “…contextual nature of a region and its constituent university incubation models where the emphasis is on contextually grounded approaches as represented by different stakeholder groupings and their voices, tensions and synergies (Asheim and Coenen, 2005; Etzkowitz, et al., 2005; Plewa et al., 2013).”
Demographic patterns and trends in patenting: Gender, age, and education of inventors (2014, background): “On the other hand, technologies with more synthetic knowledge (Asheim and Coenen 2005), such as mechanical and machinery, may be developed more by field inventors who receive relatively little formal education.”
Knowledge-Based Regional Economic Development: A Synthetic Review of Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship, and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (2018, background): “Despite being considered nonrival and nonexcludable (or partially excludable in EGT), knowledge bases vary across regional economies (Asheim & Coenen, 2005; Audretsch & Feldman, 1996; Feldman & Audretsch, 1999).”
The Role of Trials and Demonstration Projects in the Development of a Sustainable Bioeconomy (2017, background): “The integration of both synthetic and analytical knowledge bases become even more evident when adding a spatial dimension to the analysis of demonstration projects [36] (p.”
Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem (2017, background): “Moreover, the key source of knowledge spillovers with both regional clusters and RIS are research institutes and universities (Asheim and Coenen, 2005), which are also important”
How firms collaborate with public research organizations : The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects (2016, background): “Our findings confirm that engineeringbased firms rely on local partners when they establish research collaborations (Asheim and Coenen, 2005).”
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “The recent literature of regional innovation systems view innovation as a collective process where regional innovation emerges from localized, innovation-related and institutionally supported networks (Braczyk et al., 1998; Koschatzky & Sternberg, 2000; Asheim & Coenen, 2005).”
The Geography of Complex Knowledge (2017, background): “Long-run creativity in regions is linked to institutional practices that foster open knowledge architectures, absorptive capacity, and connections to pools of knowledge generated elsewhere (Cohen and Levinthal 1990; Bathelt, Malmberg, and Maskell 2004; Asheim and Coenen 2005).”
Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy (2014, background): “Technovation (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013i At its most rudimentary level a “regional innovation system can be thought of as the institutional infrastructure supporting innovation within the production structure of a region” (Asheim and Coenen, 2005, p. 1177).”
Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: an explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities (2010, background): “However it would be misleading to purely isolate the system from its environment [37].”
Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden (2013, background): “…exceptions, done so without empirics or through in-depth case studies of innovation processes carried out by single firms and/ or project groups (Asheim and Coenen, 2005; Asheim and Gertler, 2005; Moodysson, 2008; Moodysson et al., 2008) or through indirect measures of knowledge collaboration…”
A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy (2016, methodology): “In this way, innovation policy is used as an important tool for governmental institutions to enhance and support innovations on different geographical scales to promote economic growth (see e.g. Asheim and Coenen 2005; Pettersson 2007; Lindberg 2010).”