A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy

By Ida Grundel, Margareta Dahlström. 2016

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article aims to understand the possible preconditions for the transformation of a regional innovation system (RIS) into a quadruple and quintuple helix system applied to the development of a sustainable forestry-based bioeconomy in Värmland, Sweden. Research points to the necessity not only of further developing current innovation systems to include more actors than earlier but also of taking concern for the environment as a way towards attaining sustainability. The research was carried out in response to the need to understand the fourth helix and its role in RIS and to transform to a sustainable bioeconomy, as identified by researchers, policymakers and industry representatives. This study was inspired by participatory transdisciplinarity and a transdisciplinary research design, acknowledging the importance of a variety of actors in knowledge production from different spheres of society. Much of the empirical material gathered for this research was based on interviews and a workshop with different stakeholders. The results show that the use of a quintuple helix RIS in Värmland for the transformation to a forestry-based bioeconomy could be a possible way forward towards sustainability. The model proposes that involvement of civil society in the innovation system could contribute to a larger societal transformation that aims to change consumer behaviour, production patterns, technological developments, infrastructure, norms and values. However, the involvement of civil society in the innovation system must still be regarded as part of a vision statement in regional policy documents.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8907eba2994d70ea6d7f8376de10e7369b70906

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

  1. Teis Hansen

In Management of Technology and Innovation

  1. Teis Hansen
  2. Markus Grillitsch
  3. Nina Hasche
  4. Linda Höglund
  5. S. Jolly
  6. Gabriel Linton

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Nina Hasche
  2. Linda Höglund
  3. Teis Hansen
  4. S. Jolly
  5. Markus Grillitsch
  6. Gabriel Linton

Citations in the corpus