Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III.
By J. Shaw, Edgar B. Lickey, E. Schilling, R. Small. American-Eurasian journal of botany, 2007
2,081 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dde866ddb7471f371f9b86e2178dd12ada2f8daf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- D. Richardson
- John R. U. Wilson
- D. Quandt
- J. L. Le Roux
- Boštjan Surina
- G. Schneeweiss
- D. Murphy
- Thomas Borsch
In Genetics
- D. Richardson
- Carlos E. González‐Orozco
- G. C. d'Eeckenbrugge
- M. Byrne
- S. Graham
- Michael J. Moore
- M. Blanco
- Shiliang Zhou
In Molecular Biology
- Thomas Borsch
- D. Quandt
- Boštjan Surina
- G. Schneeweiss
- Michael J. Moore
- S. R. Downie
- Carlos E. González‐Orozco
- M. Byrne
Citations in the corpus
- Phylogeographic consequences of different introduction histories of invasive Australian Acacia species and Paraserianthes lophantha (Fabaceae) in South Africa (2011, methodology): “For A. pycnantha, we amplified the rpl32-trnL(UAG) chloroplast intergenic spacer region using primers described by Shaw et al. (2007).”
- Area and the rapid radiation of Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae) (2012, methodology): “The chloroplast loci used in this study (trnV–ndhC, rpl32f–trnL, trnQ–rps16 and rpl32r–ndhF) are non-coding introns and spacers and are (on average across a wide variety of plant families) the four most rapidly evolving markers known from this genome (Shaw et al., 2007), although substitution rate h”
- Phylogenetic utility of ycf1 in orchids: a plastid gene more variable than matK (2009, background): “However, relatively few chloroplast regions are commonly used for phylogenetic studies, although efforts have been made to discover more variable ones (Shaw et al. 2005, 2007).”
- Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. (2010, background): “Universal chloroplast DNA sequences [74] are now being used to determine the phylogenetic relationships among cultivated and wild populations in the core collection, as well as the closely related B.”
- DNA barcoding: a tool for improved taxon identification and detection of species diversity (2011, background): “This spacer region is considered to be the most variable plastid region in angiosperms (e.g., Kress and Erickson 2007, but see, Shaw et al. 2007).”
- Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome (2015, background): “These attributes make trnHpsbA highly suitable as a plant barcode for species discrimination (Kress & Erickson, 2007; Shaw et al., 2007), and extensive barcoding studies demonstrated that in some land plant groups such as Hydrocotyle, Dendrobium and Pteridophytes (van de Wiel et al.”
- The chloroplast genome: a review (2020, background): “Among terrestrial plants, the cpDNA is highly conserved, in terms of both structure and the content and order of the placement of particular genes (Shaw et al. 2007).”