Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops.

By C. Clement, M. Cristo-Araújo, G. C. d'Eeckenbrugge, Alessandro Rhadamek Alves Pereira, Doriane Picanço-Rodrigues. 2010

344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Molecular analyses are providing new elements to decipher the origin, domestication and dispersal of native Amazonian crops in an expanding archaeological context. Solid molecular data are available for manioc (Manihot esculenta), cacao (Theobroma cacao), pineapple (Ananas comosus), peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) and guarana (Paullinia cupana), while hot peppers (Capsicum spp.), inga (Inga edulis), Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) and cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum) are being studied. Emergent patterns include the relationships among domestication, antiquity (terminal Pleistocene to early Holocene), origin in the periphery, ample pre-Columbian dispersal and clear phylogeographic population structure for manioc, pineapple, peach palm and, perhaps, Capsicum peppers. Cacao represents the special case of an Amazonian species possibly brought into domestication in Mesoamerica, but close scrutiny of molecular data suggests that it may also have some incipiently domesticated populations in Amazonia. Another pattern includes the relationships among species with incipiently domesticated populations or very recently domesticated populations, rapid pre- or post-conquest dispersal and lack of phylogeographic population structure, e.g., Brazil nut, cupuassu and guarana. These patterns contrast the peripheral origin of most species with domesticated populations with the subsequent concentration of their genetic resources in the center of the basin, along the major white water rivers where high pre-conquest population densities developed. Additional molecular genetic analyses on these and other species will allow better examination of these processes and will enable us to relate them to other historical ecological patterns in Amazonia.

Subfields: History, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77331a21137f303a3f860fb427f6d977f208b547

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History

  1. M. Arroyo-Kalin
  2. D. Fuller
  3. D. Piperno
  4. G. Willcox

In Plant Science

  1. D. Fuller
  2. M. Arroyo-Kalin
  3. P. Gepts
  4. Rachel S. Meyer
  5. Robin G. Allaby
  6. J. Pires
  7. T. Cavagnaro
  8. J. Cliff

Citations in the corpus