Phylogenetic utility of ycf1 in orchids: a plastid gene more variable than matK

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Monocot fossils suitable for molecular dating analyses (2015, background): “However, the higher-order phylogeny of Epidendroideae is largely unresolved and assigning these genera to subclades is therefore problematic (e.g. Cameron, 2004; Freudenstein et al., 2004; van den Berg et al., 2005; Neubig et al., 2008; Górniak, Paun & Chase, 2010).”
Generic recircumscriptions of Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae: Cymbidieae) based on maximum likelihood analysis of combined DNA datasets (2012, background): “…33 ¥ (94 °C for 1 min; 58 °C for 1 min; 72 °C for 1 min 20 s); 72 °C for 6 min, with the primers F and R sensu Xu et al. (2000). ycf1: We sequenced two noncontiguous portions of ycf1 (Neubig et al., 2009) including approximately 1200 bp from the 5′ end and approximately 1500 bp from the 3′ end.”
Highly Variable Chloroplast Markers for Evaluating Plant Phylogeny at Low Taxonomic Levels and for DNA Barcoding (2012, background): “It is more variable than the matK locus in the Orchidaceae [29].”