Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds

By H. Lu, R. Bernardo. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dddf8485b16935bb9b75f256c6680a6826b538fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. M. Tollenaar
2. Marilyn Warburton
3. Elizabeth A. Lee
4. Yunbi Xu
5. J. Dudley
6. J. Crouch
7. Jianbing Yan
8. S. Taba

In Plant Science

1. M. Tollenaar
2. Elizabeth A. Lee
3. Marilyn Warburton
4. Yunbi Xu
5. J. Crouch
6. J. Dudley
7. Jianbing Yan
8. S. Taba

Citations in the corpus

• Conserving and Enhancing Maize Genetic Resources as Global Public Goods- A Perspective from CIMMYT (2010, background): “, 2004), (ii) construction of “phylogenetic” trees and determination of genetic distances (Lu and Bernardo, 2001; Warburton et al., 2002; Betrán et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2003; Reif et al., 2004; Xia et al., 2004, 2005) and determination of heterotic groups (Warburton et al.”
• Molecular Characterization of Maize Inbreds with Expired U.S. Plant Variety Protection (2008, background): “Five thousand random samples (Lu and Bernardo, 2001) of 13 lines, which is the number of lines in the smallest subset, were drawn without replacement from all subsets with >13 lines.”
• Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection (2005, methodology): “Pairwise genetic similarity values (GSij) among all accessions were calculated as the proportion of loci with shared alleles (Lu and Bernardo 2001; Matsuoka et al. 2002a) in NTSYS-pc software version 2.0 (Rohlf 1997), by using the simple matching coefficient for multi-state qualitative data: GSij ¼…”
• Physiological Basis of Successful Breeding Strategies for Maize Grain Yield (2007, background): “, 1990), and has resulted in somewhere between two and seven distinct heterotic patterns being described (Smith and Smith, 1989; Troyer, 1999; Lu and Bernardo, 2001; Gethi et al., 2002; Mikel and Dudley, 2006).”
• Use of doubled haploids in maize breeding: implications for intellectual property protection and genetic diversity in hybrid crops (2008, background): “However, continued access to welladapted and already widely-used inbred lines constricts the genetic base (Lu and Bernardo 2001).”
• High-throughput SNP genotyping with the GoldenGate assay in maize (2010, background): “However, SNPs are bi-allelic markers that generally detect only two alleles per SNP marker, while SSRs are multi-allelic markers capable of detecting a very large number of alleles per locus (Lu and Bernardo 2001; Liu et al. 2003), only limited by the nature and extent of the germplasm being tested.”
• Assessing the genetic diversity of Portuguese maize germplasm using microsatellite markers (2004, methodology): “SSR polymorphisms have been extensively used as genetic markers in genetic maize studies such as for the construction of linkage maps and QTL mapping (Romero-Severson, 1998; Frova et al., 1999) or the analysis of genetic diversity and evolution (Senior et al., 1998; Pejic et al., 1998; Lu & Bernard”
• Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data (2006, background): “et al., 1997; Pejic et al., 1998; Senior et al. 1998; Lu & Bernardo, 2001; Li et al., 2002).”
• Evolution of North American Dent Corn from Public to Proprietary Germplasm (2006, background): “Heterotic groups in dent corn have been subdivided into Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) and non-BSSS ( Lu and Bernardo, 2001 ).”