The importance of replication in wildlife research
By Douglas H. Johnson. 2002
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd87fffa25dafe6314f19e99eb2b257c10be20db
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Genetics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Using information theory as a substitute for stepwise regression in ecology and behavior (2010, unknown): “In ecology and evolution, where it is often impossible to achieve even a partial experimental control of confounding factors, correlative pattern identification will always play an important role (Johnson 2002).”
- Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology (2007, result): “One approach is the replication of entire studies (i.e., metareplication), whereby conclusions derived from separate studies of the same process provide a more powerful test of the generality of findings than could any single study ( Johnson 2002).”
- Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: using weighted evidence from the literature (2011, methodology): “Inference also is weakened by insufficient replication in space and time (Johnson 2002).”
- MMI: Multimodel inference or models with management implications? (2015, background): “We should, however, be cautious of conclusions drawn from individual studies, keep an open mind to the possibility of different explanations for observed phenomenon, and begin to accept a theory as useful only if results are replicated under a range of conditions (Johnson 2002).”
- Impact of habitat management on grey partridge populations: assessing wildlife cover using a multisite BACI experiment (2004, methodology): “replication of entire studies) was used to give confidence in the generality of the results, as the scheme was tested over different natural situations within the same habitat (Johnson 2002).”
- Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success (2009, result): “…include a subset of control nests where cameras are not deployed; 8) avoid long-term, persistent use of camera surveillance in individual study areas (Renfrew and Ribic 2003); 9) report DSR, nest cycle lengths, and exposure days for comparison with other studies (Manolis et al. 2000, Johnson 2002).”
- PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ROOST SELECTION BY REPRODUCTIVE FEMALE HOARY BATS (LASIURUS CINEREUS) (2005, background): “Pseudoreplicated studies that use this approach are still valuable from a metareplication perspective (Johnson 2002), but they may be less informative than studies that control for individual-specific preferences.”
- Patch Size and Landscape Effects on Density and Nesting Success of Grassland Birds (2006, background): “…the usefulness of short-term studies: 1) replication of existing studies to test if similar results are obtained in different regions and years (Johnson 2002); 2) inclusion of several small-scale studies within a large-scale study; 3) investigation of topics that are likely to have relatively…”