MMI: Multimodel inference or models with management implications?

By J. Fieberg, Douglas H. Johnson. 2015

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We consider a variety of regression modeling strategies for analyzing observational data associated with typical wildlife studies, including all subsets and stepwise regression, a single full model, and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC)-based multimodel inference. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach, we suggest that there is no unique best way to analyze data. Further, we argue that, although multimodel inference can be useful in natural resource management, the importance of considering causality and accurately estimating effect sizes is greater than simply considering a variety of models. Determining causation is far more valuable than simply indicating how the response variable and explanatory variables covaried within a data set, especially when the data set did not arise from a controlled experiment. Understanding the causal mechanism will provide much better predictions beyond the range of data observed. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfd4f173d46fa9fdf9e475a161c946b449e7cc55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. David Hodgson
  2. Maria Eugenia Correa-Cano
  3. Beth S Robinson
  4. Richard Inger
  5. Lynda Donaldson
  6. David N. Fisher
  7. J. Evans
  8. Cecily E. D. Goodwin

In Ecology

  1. Richard Inger
  2. David Hodgson
  3. Maria Eugenia Correa-Cano
  4. Beth S Robinson
  5. Lynda Donaldson
  6. David N. Fisher
  7. J. Evans
  8. Cecily E. D. Goodwin

Citations in the corpus