Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success

By T. Richardson, T. Gardali, S. Jenkins. 2009

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8984847668b76f0d59933b1f3cd0555e9dd7e93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo
2. R. Magrath
3. A. Chalfoun
4. T. Haff
5. C. Stracey
6. Janis Dickinson
7. B. Hatchwell
8. Pamela M. Fallow

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo
2. R. Magrath
3. A. Chalfoun
4. T. Haff
5. C. Stracey
6. B. Hatchwell
7. Janis Dickinson
8. Pamela M. Fallow

Citations in the corpus

• Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives (2015, background): “Nest monitoring by cameras seems to be generally safe for nests (Weidinger 2008; Richardson et al. 2009; IbáñezAlámo et al. 2012), but validating this assumption in specific studies is important.”
• Resolving the urban nest predator paradox: The role of alternative foods for nest predators (2011, methodology): “I also tested for an effect of camera on nest predation rates (Richardson et al., 2009) in 2008 and 2009 using the logistic exposure method (Shaffer, 2004).”