Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis.

By C. Braunschweig, P. Levy, Patricia M Sheean, Xin Wang. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2001

675 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd79099632a752694f5305bdacec093459efec7f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nutrition and Dietetics

1. P. Calder
2. Todd W. Rice
3. I. Djuricić
4. M. Rogero

In Physiology

1. P. Calder
2. S. Bischoff

In Surgery

1. P. Calder
2. D. Heyland
3. S. Bischoff
4. A. Day
5. O. Ljungqvist
6. R. Dhaliwal

Citations in the corpus

• Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) (2009, methodology): “In a subset of patients from the EPaNiC study for whom there was an absolute contraindication to the use of EN (such as bowel in discontinuity), Casaer et al showed that those patients for whom use of PN was started on ICU day 3 had worse infectious morbidity and were less likely to be discharged al”
• ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: intensive care. (2006, background): “EN, Braunschweig et al.(15) found a higher risk of infection associated with PN, which could be partially explained by the higher number of patients with hyperglycemia in this population.”
• The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study (2009, result): “This is consistent with results of RCTs of parenteral nutrition in elective surgery patients, which show a benefit in malnourished patients only [6, 7].”
• Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). (2009, methodology): “In a subset of patients from the EPaNiC study for whom there was an absolute contraindication to the use of EN (such as bowel in discontinuity), Casaer et al showed that those patients for whom use of PN was started on ICU day 3 had worse infectious morbidity and were less likely to be discharged al”
• ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. (2017, background): “including nonrandomized studies as well, however, do favour PN for malnourished patients [235] (2þþ).”