The Risks and Opportunities of the IEP Requirements Under IDEA '97

By D. S. Huefner. 2000

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Direct Observation of Teacher-Directed IEP Meetings: Establishing the Need for Student IEP Meeting Instruction (2006, background): “At annual IEP meetings, people influential in a student’s life develop a blueprint for the educational services that meet the unique needs of that student (Huefner, 2000).”
Inclusion and Special Education (2020, background): “it also resulted in creating more problems as majority of special education teachers were unprepared for the changes and the additional work load [28].”
Perceptions of Parents of Students with Autism towards the IEP Meeting: A Case Study of One Family Support Group Chapter. (2004, unknown): “The IEP functions as the blueprint for the delivery of services to be provided for students receiving special education services, as IEP regulations identify meeting dates, parental and student consent and accountability, as well as responsibilities of educational agencies (Huefner, 2000).”
Encouraging Active Parent Participation in IEP Team Meetings (2004, unknown): “At the same time, it must meet legal requirements relative to who participates on the IEP team and how, including the parent (Council for Exceptional Children, 1999; Drasgow, Yell, & Robinson, 2001; Huefner, 2000 ).”