Public Displays of Connection
By Judith S. Donath, D. boyd. 2004
1,442 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd2b80f901f501c4dfaaccfc895bfa2f897c86b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Cliff Lampe
- Sonja Utz
- Charles W. Steinfield
- June Ahn
- Petter Bae Brandtzæg
- Jessica Vitak
- Alessandro Acquisti
In Sociology and Political Science
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Sonja Utz
- Charles W. Steinfield
- Cliff Lampe
- June Ahn
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- Petter Bae Brandtzæg
- Alessandro Acquisti
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Charles W. Steinfield
- Cliff Lampe
- Sonja Utz
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- Lee Humphreys
- T. Bosch
- Zizi Papacharissi
Citations in the corpus
- The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld (2009, background): “This comparative analysis examines the symbolic representations of everyday communicative routines that these social networks create for their users, so as to understand the significance of virtual architecture.”
- Exploring athlete brand image development on social media: the role of signalling through source credibility (2020, background): “According to signalling theory, receivers evaluate the signals they encounter with respect to the economic resources, energy, or time spent on crafting the message (Donath & Boyd, 2004; Griskevicius et al., 2007).”
- The Role of Social Networking Sites in Early Adolescents’ Social Lives (2016, background): “There are several related features of SNS use that can enhance social capital (e.g., Donath & Boyd, 2004; Valenzuela et al., 2009).”
- “Friending” Professors, Parents and Bosses: A Facebook Connection Conundrum (2011, background): “According to Donath and Boyd (2004), humans use time and space “in the physical world” (p.”
- Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment (2006, background): “Perceptions that others are lying may encourage reciprocal deception, because users will exaggerate to the extent that they feel others are exaggerating or deceiving (Fiore & Donath, 2004).”
- Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization (2009, background): “SNSs provide affordances that enable users to create and maintain a network of heterogeneous connections – an important component of bridging social capital [5, 15, 17].”
- Social Networking Sites: Their Users and Social Implications - A Longitudinal Study (2012, background): “Key words: face-to-face interactions, loneliness, social capital, social networking sites, user types doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01580.x”
- Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook (2006, background): “In particular, [5], [6], and [7] have taken ethnographic and sociological approaches to the study of online self-representation; [8] have focused on the value of online social networks as recommender systems; [4] have discussed information sharing and privacy on online social networks, using FB as a”
- Facebook Psychology: Popular Questions Answered by Research (2012, background): “This means that they can forge and sustain information-facilitating connections with existing, close friends as well as with less wellknown (or unknown) acquaintances (Donath & Boyd, 2004; Ellison et al., 2007).”
- The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations (2015, background): “Scholarship on SNSs has articulated the way in which this articulated network helps people connect to friends of friends (Donath & boyd, 2004), thus encountering the diverse world-views and novel information associated with bridging social capital (Ellison et al., 2007).”
- A Meta-Analysis of Social Networking Online and Social Capital (2016, background): “SNSs also may facilitate the accrual of bridging social capital because they allow users to create and maintain large, diffuse networks of relationships from which they can potentially draw resources (Donath & Boyd, 2004; Resnick, 2002; Wellman, 2001).”
- Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace (2007, background): “Studies of the first popular social networking site, Friendster, (boyd, 2004, boyd, 2006, boyd and Heer, 2006, Donath and boyd, 2004) describe how members create their profile with the intention of communicating news about themselves to others.”
- A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter (2012, background): “Data indicate that curvilinear effects for number of followers exist, such that having too many or too few connections results in lower judgments of expertise and trustworthiness.”
- Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success (2017, background): “Accordingly, the social capital developed through these interactions is formed by comparatively weaker ties (Donath & Boyd, 2004) that eventually become inactive.”
- Age differences in online social networking - A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace (2009, background): “Donath and Boyd (2004) stated that the strength of weak ties (bridging social capital) lies both in the large number of available weak ties and in the diversity of other people that can be reached through these ties.”
- Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook (2008, background): “Donath and boyd (2004) argue that online social networking systems can help individuals to maintain a larger number of close ties than people can typically maintain without such technology, as the systems allow people to check one another's sites for updates, reflect new activities, as well as to…”
- Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: mediated temporality, duration and affect (2017, background): “These structures disrupt traditional notions of public and private and online and offline and individual and group (boyd & Heer, 2006; Donath & boyd, 2004; Marwick & boyd, 2014).”