Electron Heating in Hot Accretion Flows

By P. Sharma, E. Quataert, Gregory W. Hammett, James M. Stone. 2007

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Local (shearing box) simulations of the nonlinear evolution of the magnetorotational instability in a collisionless plasma show that angular momentum transport by pressure anisotropy (p⊥ ≠ p∥, where the directions are defined with respect to the local magnetic field) is comparable to that due to the Maxwell and Reynolds stresses. Pressure anisotropy, which is effectively a large-scale viscosity, arises because of adiabatic invariants related to p⊥ and p∥ in a fluctuating magnetic field. In a collisionless plasma, the magnitude of the pressure anisotropy, and thus the viscosity, is determined by kinetic instabilities at the cyclotron frequency. Our simulations show that ~50% of the gravitational potential energy is directly converted into heat at large scales by the viscous stress (the remaining energy is lost to grid-scale numerical dissipation of kinetic and magnetic energy). We show that electrons receive a significant fraction [~(Te/Ti)1/2] of this dissipated energy. Employing this heating by an anisotropic viscous stress in one-dimensional models of radiatively inefficient accretion flows, we find that the radiative efficiency of the flow is greater than 0.5% for ≳ 10-4Edd. Thus, a low accretion rate, rather than just a low radiative efficiency, is necessary to explain the low luminosity of many accreting black holes. For Sgr A* in the Galactic center, our predicted radiative efficiencies imply an accretion rate of ≈3 × 10-8 M☉ yr-1 and an electron temperature of ≈3 × 1010 K at ≈10 Schwarzschild radii; the latter is consistent with the brightness temperature inferred from VLBI observations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd0f352c2bc371b1d7171de10cc98f71f4833c69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. F. Yuan
  3. J. McKinney
  4. T. Johannsen
  5. J. Dexter
  6. A. Tchekhovskoy
  7. E. Quataert
  8. M. Mościbrodzka

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. A. Tchekhovskoy
  3. J. McKinney
  4. J. Dexter
  5. F. Yuan
  6. T. Johannsen
  7. A. Broderick
  8. E. Agol

Citations in the corpus