RADIATIVE MODELS OF SGR A* FROM GRMHD SIMULATIONS

By M. Mościbrodzka, Charles F. Gammie, Joshua C. Dolence, H. Shiokawa, P. Leung. 2009

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using flow models based on axisymmetric general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulations, we construct radiative models for Sgr A*. Spectral energy distributions (SEDs) that include the effects of thermal synchrotron emission and absorption, and Compton scattering, are calculated using a Monte Carlo technique. Images are calculated using a ray-tracing scheme. All models are scaled so that the 230 GHz flux density is 3.4 Jy. The key model parameters are the dimensionless black hole spin a*, the inclination i, and the ion-to-electron temperature ratio Ti/Te. We find that (1) models with Ti/Te = 1 are inconsistent with the observed submillimeter spectral slope; (2) the X-ray flux is a strongly increasing function of a*; (3) the X-ray flux is a strongly increasing function of i; (4) 230 GHz image size is a complicated function of i, a*, and Ti/Te, but the Ti/Te = 10 models are generally large and at most marginally consistent with the 230 GHz very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) data; (5) for models with Ti/Te = 10 and i = 85° the event horizon is cloaked behind a synchrotron photosphere at 230 GHz and will not be seen by VLBI, but these models overproduce near-infrared and X-ray flux; (6) in all models whose SEDs are consistent with observations, the event horizon is uncloaked at 230 GHz; (7) the models that are most consistent with the observations have a* ∼ 0.9. We finish with a discussion of the limitations of our model and prospects for future improvements.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25cd7b1c96311c1d5fdeb8f8df2192e5f663f217

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. T. Johannsen
  3. F. Yuan
  4. J. McKinney
  5. E. Quataert
  6. R. Genzel
  7. J. Dexter
  8. A. Tchekhovskoy

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. T. Johannsen
  3. F. Yuan
  4. A. Tchekhovskoy
  5. J. McKinney
  6. J. Dexter
  7. A. Broderick
  8. Abraham Loeb

Citations in the corpus