THE SUBMILLIMETER BUMP IN Sgr A* FROM RELATIVISTIC MHD SIMULATIONS

By J. Dexter, E. Agol, P. Chris Fragile, J. McKinney. 2010

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent high resolution observations of the Galactic center black hole allow for direct comparison with accretion disk simulations. We compare two-temperature synchrotron emission models from three-dimensional, general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations to millimeter observations of Sgr A*. Fits to very long baseline interferometry and spectral index measurements disfavor the monochromatic face-on black hole shadow models from our previous work. Inclination angles ⩽20° are ruled out to 3σ. We estimate the inclination and position angles of the black hole, as well as the electron temperature of the accretion flow and the accretion rate, to be , , Te = (5.4 ± 3.0) × 1010 K, and , respectively, with 90% confidence. The black hole shadow is unobscured in all best-fit models, and may be detected by observations on baselines between Chile and California, Arizona, or Mexico at 1.3 mm or .87 mm either through direct sampling of the visibility amplitude or using closure phase information. Millimeter flaring behavior consistent with the observations is present in all viable models and is caused by magnetic turbulence in the inner radii of the accretion flow. The variability at optically thin frequencies is strongly correlated with that in the accretion rate. The simulations provide a universal picture of the 1.3 mm emission region as a small region near the midplane in the inner radii of the accretion flow, which is roughly isothermal and has ν/νc ∼ 1–20, where νc is the critical frequency for thermal synchrotron emission.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8aa844df1db368a617105b65ec516c1ee00d573

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. T. Johannsen
  2. Ramesh Narayan
  3. R. Genzel
  4. F. Yuan
  5. J. Dexter
  6. J. McKinney
  7. Dimitrios Psaltis
  8. Abraham Loeb

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. T. Johannsen
  2. Ramesh Narayan
  3. F. Yuan
  4. J. Dexter
  5. J. McKinney
  6. A. Tchekhovskoy
  7. M. Mościbrodzka
  8. Dimitrios Psaltis

Citations in the corpus