Protective Factors Interrupting the Continuity From School Bullying to Later Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: A Systematic Review of Prospective Longitudinal Studies

By Maria M. Ttofi, L. Bowes, David P. Farrington, F. Lösel. 2014

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcf4cbeac4f56b7ac6141fe79d8be1d117ce812f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Patricia McDougall
2. Elan C. Hope
3. T. Vaillancourt

In Safety Research

1. Elan C. Hope
2. Shelley Hymel

In Social Psychology

1. T. Vaillancourt
2. Patricia McDougall
3. Elan C. Hope
4. Shelley Hymel
5. Christina Salmivalli
6. Susan M. Swearer

Citations in the corpus

• Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: Pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. (2015, result): “Based on the research reviewed, the strongest candidate for interruption includes the presence and/or absence of support from friends, teachers, and parents—a contention that is similarly supported by a systematic review of longitudinal studies (Ttofi et al., 2014).”
• Understanding Experiences With Bullying and Bias-Based Bullying: What Matters and for Whom? (2018, background): “Although social support may, at times, buffer against negative effects of bullying (Mishna et al., 2016; Ttofi et al., 2014), our findings highlight that social support is only protective for those who report bullying that is not connected to bias against one or more of their social identities.”