Utility of No Sweat Labels for Apparel Consumers: Profiling Label Users and Predicting Their Purchases

By M. Dickson. 2001

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcd9408fa83efe7e0bd2ce0a35b366c280fcd465

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. J. Graafland
2. T. Newholm
3. Wim Verbeke
4. D. Shaw
5. C. Valor
6. Iris Vermeir
7. Tan Hoi Piew
8. Ooi Jen Mei

Citations in the corpus

• The Antecedents of Green Purchase Intention among Malaysian Consumers (2012, background): ““Value-action gap is a gap between the high value people place on the nature environment and relatively low level of action taken by individuals to counter environmental problems” (Dickson, 2001).”
• Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap (2006, background): “This empirical study indicates that young consumers in Belgium are rather highly involved with sustainable food consumption (hence, contradicting Dickson, 2001 ).”
• Religiosity, Attitude, and the Demand for Socially Responsible Products (2017, background): “Dickson (2001) showed that in the US, concern about sweatshop practices is significantly correlated with the likelihood of a person buying textiles with a ‘no sweat’ label.”
• Studying the ethical consumer: a review of research (2007, background): “From a managerial perspective, therefore, ethical consumers tend to be conceived in terms of niche size (see e.g. Langeland, 1998; Dickson, 2001) and an ‘opportunity to develop [a retailers’] profile in terms of corporate social responsibility [and] also a chance to develop a competitive advantage…”
• Can Consumers Buy Responsibly? Analysis and Solutions for Market Failures (2008, background): “These costs include, inter alia, paying a premium price, travelling a certain distance to find good performers (e.g., organic or fair trade products), or spending too much time locating a brand at the selling point (Beckmann 2007; Berger and Kanetkar 1995; Dickson 2001; Garret 1987; Laroche et al.”