Quantitative syntheses of the effects of administrative segregation on inmates’ well-being.

By R. Morgan, P. Gendreau, P. Smith, Andrew L. Gray, R. Labrecque, Nina MacLean, S. Horn, Angelea D. Bolaños, Ashley B. Batastini, J. Mills. 2016

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eaaadb0858e3163a99573e11dd39dab874dbd35c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. C. Haney

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Haney
2. Kelly Hannah-Moffat

Citations in the corpus

• The Psychological Effects of Solitary Confinement: A Systematic Critique (2018, methodology): “In separate but related ways, both the Colorado study and the Morgan et al. (2016) meta-analyses underscore the pitfalls of allowing the veneer of scientific rigor to substitute for its reality.”
• Restricting the Use of Solitary Confinement (2018, background): “…claiming to comprehensively and quantitatively summarize the scientific literature on the psychological effects of solitary confinement (Morgan et al. 2016) was unfortunately compromised by the fact that half or more of the key effect sizes on which the authors relied to address this…”