Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services

By Margherita Pagani. 2004

641 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcc5b659c52f1ac32bc641f1ef5cbdcbf31ff507

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients (2014, background): “Other TAM studies (e.g. Davis, 1989; Davis et al., 1989; Venkatesh and Davis, 2000) have concluded that ease of use has less impact on technology acceptance than usefulness; this is because ease of use impinges on technology acceptance through perceived usefulness (Pikkarainen et al., 2004).”
The effects of convenience and speed in m-payment (2015, background): “Recognizing this importance, Pagani (2004) have listed the speed of use as the most critical determinant of mobile multimedia services adoption.”
An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models (2008, background): “Mobility, availability, and personalization, may also be important perceived benefits of (multimedia) mobile services [26].”
An investigation of consumer acceptance of M-Banking in Australia (2010, result): “Thus, this study validates the literature that has found a significant negative relationship between cost and intention to use M-Services (Khalifa and Ning Shen, 2008; Luarn and Lin, 2005; Pagani, 2004).”
The Relationship between Self-Confidence, Self-Efficacy, Grit, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of eLearning Platforms in Corporate Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021, background): “Literature has provided ample data that confirm the associations between self-confidence, grit, and self-efficacy [9,12,13] but also between ease of use and usefulness as key predictors of digital educational tool adoption [14].”
Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications (2010, background): “Pagani (2004) mentions ease of use and navigation, limitation in bandwidth, cost, hardware and software functionality and privacy as obstacles in the use of mobile multimedia services, while Vrechoupoulos et al. (2003) discuss complicated use, lack of security, poor quality of service, high price…”
User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value (2016, background): “The availability of hardware and software functions are considered among the perceived advantages of multimedia mobile service adoption (Pagani, 2004).”
Adoption of Mobile Devices/Services — Searching for Answers with the UTAUT (2006, background): “In studies on the adoption of mobile services, results have fairly well complied with central factors in the TAM: perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness [ 19 , 26], the latter study, however, focused on mobile phones.”
Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce (2006, background): “[49] examined adoption of mobile gaming, Pagani [71] explored mobile multimedia services (photo messaging, mobile e-mail, video messaging, and postcard messaging), and Luarn and Lin [61] investigated behavioral intention to use mobile banking.”