Reassessing (home-)regionalisation
By T. Osegowitsch, André Sammartino. 2008
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc77009df8223f4d9bf89865cbb884bc5df2864a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Lee Li
- Gongming Qian
- Alan M. Rugman
- Alain Verbeke
- Chang Hoon Oh
- D. Lim
- Rajneesh Narula
- Christian Geisler Asmussen
In Sociology and Political Science
In Strategy and Management
- Alan M. Rugman
- Alain Verbeke
- Lee Li
- Gongming Qian
- Chang Hoon Oh
- D. Lim
- K. Meyer
- Christian Geisler Asmussen
Citations in the corpus
- Current debates in global strategy (2009, unknown): “Additionally, Osegowitsch and Sammartino (2008) called into question the classification criteria used by Rugman and Verbeke (2004) and in an empirical study demonstrate that, in using different schema, a significant proportion of firms attain global status.”
- The theory and practice of regional strategy: a response to Osegowitsch and Sammartino (2008, background): “Given this context, Osegowitsch and Sammartino (OS) (2008) provide a number of comments that may be helpful in refining future empirical work on classifying firms in function of their geographic sales dispersion.”
- Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance (2013, background): “We choose ROS over ROA, because the current debate on regionalization mainly uses sales to represent FSAs (Osegowitsch & Sammartino, 2008).”
- Global, Local, or Regional? The Locus of MNE Strategies (2016, unknown): “…to an entire new stream of research, including several subsequent empirical studies that challenged and extended this work (Dunning et al., 2007; Osegowitsch & Sammartino, 2008), and ultimately corroborated (with new methods and data) the main conclusion that MNEs do have a strong home region…”
- The regional and global competitiveness of multinational firms (2012, background): “psychic distance (Johanson and Vehlne 1977), and other distances (Ghemawat 2007; Berry et al. 2010 ).”