The Principles of Psychology: Volume 1

By Isbn. 2004

Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

Citations in the corpus

STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning (2022, background): “Human decision-making is often the result of extended chains of thought [1, 2].”
DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Data (2023, background): “This capacity to conduct meaningful visual comparisons underlies our ability to effortlessly transfer our knowledge to new environments, e.g., recognizing unseen or unfamiliar objects based on their relatedness to familiar ones [42, 70] .”
Mindfulness : A proposed operational definition (2006, background): “We also see mindfulness within the general domain of constructs that describe the ability to observe the temporal stream of thoughts and feelings including introspection (James, 1890), observing self (Deikman, 1982), presence (Bugental, 1987), reflective functioning (Fonagy &”
Formalizing Neurath’s Ship: Approximate Algorithms for Online Causal Learning (2016, background): “The “blooming buzzing confusion”(James, 2004, p462) of moment-tomoment sensory experience will have given way to a more coherent dance of objects and forces, relata and causal relationships.”
On the link between conscious function and general intelligence in humans and machines (2022, background): “We deﬁne attention broadly as the selection of some subset of potentially available information and the necessary exclusion of other subsets, or as James (2007) put it “...the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or…”
Molecular Affects in Human Geographies (2007, background): “Writing in 1890, William James could make the observation that `̀ while chemical action must of course accompany brain activity, ... little definite is known of its exact nature'' (1950/1890, page 101).”
Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials (2008, unknown): “Ever since James (1890), the dichotomy between an endogenous, voluntary, and controlled mode of allocating attention, and the exogenous, involuntary, and automatic capture of attention has been regarded as a fundamental distinction (e.g., Jonides, 1981; Müller & Rabbitt, 1989).”
Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-Analytic Review (2013, background): “Indeed, analogical processes occur in a variety of cognitive activities including perception, categorization, explanation, and problem solving (Goldstone & Barsalou, 1998; Hofstadter, 2001; James, 1890).”